摘要
投资性居住权的设立顺应市场经济的发展,合理设计投资性居住权具有重要意义。在参照社会性居住权制度设计规则时,应充分考虑投资性居住权的经济属性以及二者的相互联系,在居住权制度的框架内与社会性居住权保持正向的、补充的、有限制的扩张。投资性居住权在主体上可以扩张至一般民事主体,但与社会性居住权发生矛盾时,应优先保护社会性居住权人的利益;客体上可以将住宅的含义扩张至居住性质的房屋;增设裁判取得、时效取得居住权的设立方式,且同样适用登记生效主义;允许自由转让,但需局限于原居住权人的居住期限内;增设多种消灭方式,但需居住权人秉持物尽其用之原则,禁止浪费住房资源。
The establishment of investment-oriented residence rights is in line with the development of a market economy,and the rational design of such rights is of great significance.When referring to the rules for designing the system of social residence rights,full consideration should be given to the economic attributes of investment-oriented residence rights and their interconnection,maintaining a positive,complementary,and limited extension alongside social residence rights within the framework of the residence rights system.In terms of subject,investment-oriented residence rights can be extended to include general civil subjects,but in cases of conflict with social residence rights,priority should be given to protecting the interests of social residence right holders.Regarding the object,the definition of residential housing can be extended to include dwellings of a residential nature.Methods for establishing rights through judicial acquisition and acquisition through the passage of time should be added,with the same principles of registration being applicable.Transfer should be allowed,but limited to the original resident’s period of occupancy.Multiple termination methods should be added,but the principle of the efficient use of property should be upheld,and wastage of housing resources should be prohibited.
作者
李佳瑞
苏兴仁
LI Jiarui;SU Xinren(Law School of Sichuan Normal University,Chengdu 610068,Sichuan;Organization Department of Panzhihua University,Panzhihua 617000,Sichuan)
出处
《攀枝花学院学报》
2024年第2期106-118,共13页
Journal of Panzhihua University
关键词
《民法典》
投资性居住权
社会性居住权
功能扩张
权利限制
Civil Code
investment-oriented residence
social residence right
functional extension
limitation of rights
