期刊文献+

从“权力主导”到“权利本位”:刑事在线诉讼的法治悖反与归位

From‘Power Orientation"to"Right Standard":Contravention and Return of Rule of Law in Criminal Online Litigation
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着数字技术在诉讼活动中的广泛运用,诉讼活动的技术化特征日益凸显,这加深了在线诉讼治理的复杂程度。刑事诉讼无法自外于数字化的浪潮,长期渐进与短期突变共同构成某种程度上的间断平衡,表明刑事在线诉讼不仅由稳定和渐进主义逻辑所驱动,也因偶然性因素而变迁。由此引发了一系列潜在的法治风险,背离了现代法治所追求的限制公权、保障权利的基本要义。后疫情时代应当归位法治,坚持合法性思维与体系性建构,纠偏刑事在线诉讼中粗放、弹性的制度安排。通过法治思维的引领,将刑事在线诉讼发展的方向及时转换到规则论证与程序设计上,以此实现对人权的尊重与关照,保障“建设数字中国”的改革红利能够更为均衡、广泛地惠及至全国各个地区的人民群众。一方面,应当正视法律作为复杂演化系统所兼具的渐进性与偶然性,提升改革者的理性与智识,主动强化刑事在线诉讼中的权利保障,并以此为主轴为立法与改革提供方向指引与制度性框架;另一方面,应当充分尊重刑事在线诉讼发展的底层逻辑,遵循渐进调适的路径,分解改革目标并依次实施、验证、调整乃至改进,逐步适应诉讼数字化的发展趋势。 With the widespread application of digital technology in litigation activities,the technical characteristics of litigation activities have become increasingly prominent,but it has also exacerbated the complexity of online litigation governance.Criminal proceedings cannot be separated from the wave of digitalization,and the discontinuous balance between long-term gradual and short-term mutations shows that criminal online litigation is not only driven by the logic of stability and gradualism,but also by the factors of contingency.This has led to a series of potential rule of law risks,deviating from the basic principles of modern rule of law that restricts public power and safeguards rights.In the post-epidemic era,the rule of law should be restored,adhering to legality thinking and systemic construction,correcting the excessive and flexible institutional arrangements of criminal online litigation.Through the guidance of the rule of law thinking,the direction of the development of criminal online litigation will be shifted to rule demonstration and procedural design in a timely manner,so as to realize the care of human rights and ensure that the reform dividend of"building a digital China"can benefit the people in all regions of the country in a more balanced and extensive manner.On the one hand,we should recognize the gradual and accidental nature of law as a complex evolving system,enhance the rationality and wisdom of reformers,actively strengthen rights protection in criminal online litigation,and use this as the main axis to provide direction and institutional framework for legislation and reform;on the other hand,we should fully respect the underlying logic of the development of criminal online litigation,follow the gradual adjustive path,decompose reform goals and implement,verify,adjust,and improve them in sequence,gradually adapting to the development trend of digital litigation.
作者 吴思远 WU Siyuan
出处 《学术月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2024年第2期124-135,共12页 Academic Monthly
关键词 数字时代 在线诉讼 刑事在线诉讼 间断平衡 法治 digital age online litigation criminal online litigation punctuated equilibrium rule of law
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

二级参考文献354

共引文献729

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部