摘要
行政协议的双重法律属性决定了行政协议的双重法律适用,协议性是行政协议的本质属性。人民法院对行政协议优益权的行使予以司法审查时,应当遵循两个方面,一方面遵循行民有别的审查思路,不仅应当与行政机关只能以民事法律为依据单方变更或者解除行政协议相区别,而且在行政机关既可以依据民事法律又可以行使行政协议优益权变更或者解除行政协议时,应当秉持行政协议优益权行使的谦抑性,坚持行政法律礼让民事法律。另一方面,审查行政协议优益权行使的合法性要件。具体而言,作为行政协议优益权行使的实质要件,公共利益本质上是利益衡量的结果,宜引入比例原则权衡公益助增与私益减损,比对何者更值得保护。同时将履行告知义务作为程序正当要件,且宜将合理补偿作为选择要件。
The dual legal attributes of administrative agreement determine the dual legal application of administrative agreement,and the agreement is the essential attribute of administrative agreement.When people’s courts conduct judicial review of administrative superiority in administrative agreements,they should follow two aspects:on the one hand,they should follow the different review ideas of the people,which should not only be different from the administrative organs which can only unilaterally change or terminate the administrative agreements on the basis of civil law.In addition,when the administrative organ can change or terminate the administrative agreement according to civil law and exercise the administrative superiority right,it should uphold the modesty and adhere to the administrative law comity to civil law.On the other hand,they should review the legality of the exercise of administrative superiority of administrative agreement.To be specific,as the essential element of the exercise of administrative superiority in administrative agreements,public interest is essentially the result of interest measurement,so it is advisable to introduce the principle of proportionality to weigh the increase of public interest and the decrease of private interest,and compare which is more worthy of protection.Meanwhile,the fulfillment of the notification obligation should be regarded as a proper requirement of the procedure,and reasonable compensation should be regarded as a choice requirement.
作者
许一云
袁磊
Xu Yiyun;Yuan Lei(Anhui Ruizheng Law Firm,Hefei Anhui 230001)
出处
《安徽警官职业学院学报》
2023年第6期15-20,共6页
Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers
关键词
行政协议
优益权
行民有别
审查要件
administrative agreement
superiority
right of action
different review requirements
