期刊文献+

亲属研究何以继续存在——从大卫·施耐德的亲属理论与批判谈起

How Should Kinship Studies Continue to Exist?Inspirations from David Schneider’s Theory and Critique of Kinship
原文传递
导出
摘要 现有文献关注到了美国人类学家大卫·施耐德在欧美人类学界的影响,但并未系统梳理以施耐德为代表的亲属研究在问题意识上的几次关键转变。本文以施氏的亲属研究、理论与批判为主线,揭示出其在问题意识上经历了从“社会”到“文化”再到“地方生物学”的转变。本文也将结合当下人类学前沿理论,简评施耐德如何在几十年前就将亲属研究从认识论层面推动到了本体论层面。 The existing literature has paid attention to how the American anthropologist David Schneider has shaped Euro-American anthropology,and yet has not systematically traced the key transformations regarding objects of inquiry in Schneiderian kinship studies.This article takes the kinship studies,theories,and critiques of Schneider as a central thread,and demonstrates how Schneiderian kinship studies have turned its central objects of inquiry from“society”to“culture”and eventually to“local biology.”Taking into account the recent developments in anthropological theories,I will comment on how Schneider has already pushed kinship studies from the level of epistemology to that of ontology several decades ago.This paper takes Schneider as a point of departure,and extends to nearly a century of kinship studies and relevant anthropological theories in Euro-American academia.I hope it will inspire more scholars of China to focus on kinship phenomena in today’s Chinese society.
作者 彭馨妍 PENG Xinyan
出处 《社会学评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2024年第1期166-188,共23页 Sociological Review of China
基金 广东省哲学社会科学规划2022年度青年项目(GD22YSH04)。
关键词 人类学理论 (新)亲属研究 生物与社会 自然与文化 大卫·施耐德 anthropological theory (new)kinship studies biology and society nature and culture David M.Schneider
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献11

  • 1Marshall Sahlins.What Kinship Is and Is Not.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,2013. 被引量:1
  • 2David Schneider.A Critique of the Study of Kinship[M].Ann Arbor:The University of Michigan Press,1984. 被引量:1
  • 3Marshall Sahlins.What Kinship Is and Is Not.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,2013. 被引量:1
  • 4Andrew Shryock.“It’s this,not that:How Marshall Sahlins solves kinship”.HAU:Journal of Ethnographic Theory,2013:3(2):271-279. 被引量:1
  • 5Robert King.“Just Growed Stories:A review of What Kinship Is-And is Not”.Journal of Evolutionary Psychology,11(2013)3:155-157. 被引量:1
  • 6Robert Parkin.“Review:Marshall Sahlins,What Kinship Is-And Is Not”.Anthropological Quarterly,2013:Vol.86,No.1:293-301. 被引量:1
  • 7Marshall Sahlins.What Kinship Is and Is Not.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,2013年第24页. 被引量:1
  • 8Stephan Feuchtwang.“What is Kinship?”,“Comment on Sahlins,Marshall.2013.What kinship is-and is not”,HAU:Journal of Ethnographic Theory,2013 3(2):281-284. 被引量:1
  • 9Cai Hua.l’homme pense par l’homme,Paris:PUF,2008. 被引量:1
  • 10蔡华.《纳人亲属制度的结构与婚姻/家庭悖论的终结》,载于《公共理性与现代学术》,北京:哈佛燕京学社和三联书店,2000年. 被引量:1

共引文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部