摘要
对物刑事强制措施是对被追诉人财产权的干预,反映出了刑事诉讼中国家公权力和公民财产权之间的紧张关系。由于财产权系公民基本权利、刑事侦查技术革新迅速、对物刑事强制措施与财产权之间的冲突明显,刑事诉讼法应当以对物刑事强制措施为背景,从立法层面助益于被追诉人财产权的有效保护。然而,当前我国对物刑事强制措施体系存在基本定性不当、启动条件模糊、程序制约缺乏等问题。对此,未来立法应当将对物刑事强制措施纳入我国刑事强制措施体系予以规制、明确对物刑事强制措施的证明标准、构建对物刑事强制措施的司法审查机制。
Taking criminal coercive measures on property is an intervention to the property rights of the accused,which reflects the tension between the public power and the property rights of citizens in criminal proceedings.Since property rights belong to the basic rights of citizens,criminal investigation technology is progressing constantly,and the conflict between criminal coercive measures on property and property rights is obvious,Criminal Procedure Law should take the criminal coercive measures on property as the background to help effectively protect the property rights of the accused from the legislative level.However,at present,there are some problems in the system of coercive measures of criminal material,such as the imperfection of qualitative quality,the ambiguity of starting conditions and the lack of procedural restriction.In this regard,the future legislation should incorporate the material criminal coercive measures into the system of criminal coercive measures to regulate,clarify the proof standard of the material criminal coercive measures,and establish the judicial review mechanism of the material criminal coercive measures.
作者
程光
CHENG Guang(People's Court of Wuhan East Lake New Technology Development Zone,Wuhan 430079,China)
出处
《北京警察学院学报》
2023年第6期23-30,共8页
Journal of Beijing Police College
基金
最高人民检察院检察理论研究课题《轻罪案件侦查监督与协作配合机制构建研究》(项目编号:GJ2022D06)
法治湖北建设研究课题重点项目《<法律援助法>的立法解读与湖北应对研究》(项目编号:FZHBJSYJ2022005)。
关键词
对物刑事强制措施
财产权
证明标准
司法审查
criminal coercive measures against objects
fundamental rights intervention
property rights
judicial review
