期刊文献+

医保药品目录动态调整的国际经验与启示 被引量:1

International Experience and Enlightenment on the Dynamic Adjustment of Medical Insurance Drug Catalog
下载PDF
导出
摘要 英国、法国、韩国的医保药品目录调整经验显示,成熟的药品价值评估体系、分类管理机制和风险分担体系发挥了重要作用。我国可以适当借鉴国际经验,创新医保药品目录的动态调整机制,完善药品分类管理体系,依托独立的卫生技术评估机构开展全流程药物评估,以及建立多方参与的风险分担体系,满足人民群众多元化医疗保障需求。 From the experience of adjusting the medical insurance drug catalog in the UK,France,and South Korea,it can be seen that mature drug value evaluation systems,classification management mechanisms,and risk sharing systems have played an important role.By appropriately drawing on international experience,we should innovate the dynamic adjustment mechanism of the medical insurance drug catalog,improve the drug classification management system,rely on independent health technology assessment institutions to conduct whole process drug evaluation,and establish a multi-party risk sharing system,in order to meet the diverse medical security demands of the people.
作者 郑王彪 郑超 孙强 ZHENG Wangbiao;ZHENG Chao;SUN Qiang(Centre for Health Management and Policy Research,School of Public Health,Cheeloo College of Medicine,Shandong University,Jinan Shandong 250012,China;不详)
出处 《卫生经济研究》 北大核心 2023年第12期62-67,共6页
基金 山东省重点研发计划(软科学项目)“医保区域不平衡对城乡医保统筹和经济社会协调发展的影响研究”(2022RKY07003) 中国博士后科学基金面上项目“新发展阶段医保政策解决因病致贫的长效机制研究”(2022M711941) 山东省社会科学规划研究项目“中共社会医疗保障百年经验对健康强省建设的启示”(21CXSXJ11)。
关键词 医保药品目录 动态调整机制 卫生技术评估 药品分类管理 medical insurance drug catalog dynamic adjustment mechanism health technology assessment drug classification manag-ement
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献31

  • 1Bae E Y, Lee E K. Pharmacoeconomic Guidelines and Their Implementation in the Positive List System in South Korea [J]. Value in Health, 2009(12): S36-S41. 被引量:1
  • 2Lee H, Kim J. Delisting Policy Reform in South Korea:Failed or Policy Change? [ J ]. Value In Health, 2012 ( 15 ) : 204-212. 被引量:1
  • 3Helmut H, Nink K, McGauran N, et al. Early benefit as- sessment of new drugs in Germany-results from2011 to 2012 [J]. Health Policy, 2014, 116(2-3) : 147-153. 被引量:1
  • 4Kanavos P, Vandoros S, Irwin R, et al. Differences in costs and access to pharmaceutical products in the EU[ EB/OL]. [ 2013-08-12 ]. http://www, europarl, europa, eu/docu- ment/activities/cont/201201/20120130ATIB6575/20120130- AT136575EN. pdf. 被引量:1
  • 5Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care. Ticagrelor: benefit assessment according to § 35a Social Code Book V; extract ; appendix A ; explanation of the operationalization of the extent of added benefit on the outcome level in accord- ance with the Regulation for Early Benefit Assessment of New Pharmaceuticals [ EB/OL ]. [ 2011-09-29 ]. https :// www. iqwig, de/download/A11-02_ Extract _ of_ dossier_ as- sessment_Ticagrelor, pdf. 被引量:1
  • 6IHS. AOK's 2014 drug prescription report highlights success of AMNOG in reducing Germany's public pharma bill [ EB/ OL]. [ 2014-12-17 ]. https://www, ihs. com/country-in- dustryforecasting, html? id = 1065995314. 被引量:1
  • 7国家人力资源和社会保障部.2014年度人力资源和社会保障事业发展统计公报[EB/OL].[2015-5-28].http://www, mohrss, gov. cnfSYrlzyhshbzb/dongtaixinwenf buneiyaowerr/201505/t20150528_162040, htm. 被引量:1
  • 8张子蔚,常峰,邵蓉.欧洲主要国家药品定价和补偿制度的比较分析[J].中国医药技术经济与管理,2008,2(6):83-86. 被引量:12
  • 9李丹,马爱霞.新上市专利药的定价方法[J].中国医药技术经济与管理,2008,2(12):77-82. 被引量:3
  • 10朱娅莉,马爱霞.法国药品的定价和报销管理机构及程序概况[J].中国医药技术经济与管理,2009,3(1):81-84. 被引量:5

共引文献56

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部