期刊文献+

典型国家创新药医保谈判准入评价标准研究及对我国的启示 被引量:10

A study on the evaluation criteria of medical insurance negotiation admittance for innovative drugs in typical countries and its enlightenment to China
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文旨在学习典型国家创新药医保谈判准入评价标准设计和框架,结合我国创新药医保谈判准入现状,为完善我国创新药医保谈判准入评价标准提供参考。查阅并总结新西兰、德国、法国创新药医保谈判准入相关的评价标准,分析其特点并与我国进行比较,探讨对我国的借鉴意义。典型国家在创新药医保谈判准入体系方面发展较为成熟,在评价内容的多样性、评价标准的科学性及谈判标准的透明度等方面值得借鉴。建议我国在评价标准设置上从以下方面进行完善:要求提交真实可信且可获得的成本分析数据供药物经济学评估研究使用,明确创新药医保谈判准入品种的评审标准,建立完善的风险控制机制。 The aim of the article was to provide references for improving the evaluation criteria of medical insurance negotiation admittance for innovative drugs by studying the design and framework of the evaluation criteria of medical insurance negotiation admittance for innovative drugs in typical countries,combined with the current situation in China.The relevant evaluation criteria of New Zealand,Germany,and France were reviewed and summarized,and their characteristics was analyzed and compared with that of China.The reference significance to our country was discussed.Typical countries are more mature in terms of the evaluation system of medical insurance negotiation admittance for innovative drugs,and the diversity of evaluation content,scientificity of evaluation criteria and transparency of negotiation criteria could provide references to our country.It is suggested that China should improve the setting of evaluation criteria from the following aspects:requirement to submit authentic and available cost analysis data for the use of pharmacoeconomic evaluation research,clarifying the evaluation criteria for the varieties of medical insurance negotiation admittance,and establishing good risk control mechanism.
作者 姚雯 颜建周 邵蓉 YAO Wen;YAN Jian-zhou;SHAO Rong(National Drug Policy and Medical Industry Economy Research Center of China Pharmaceutical University,Nanjing 211198,China)
出处 《中国新药杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2021年第12期1057-1062,共6页 Chinese Journal of New Drugs
基金 中国药科大学“双一流”学科创新团队建设项目(CPU2018GY40)。
关键词 典型国家 医保谈判 评价标准 新西兰 德国 法国 typical countries medical insurance negotiation evaluation criteria New Zealand Germany France
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献65

  • 1董文勇.德国社会医疗保险用药费用控制制度及其对中国的启示[J].环球法律评论,2006,28(2):208-217. 被引量:24
  • 2徐朝江,王卓,姚远兵.吉非替尼治疗肺癌的研究进展[J].医药导报,2007,26(3):254-257. 被引量:10
  • 3法国简况[EB/OL].百度百科[2009-7-15].http://baike.baidu.com/view/64741.htm. 被引量:1
  • 4OECD统计数据[EB/OL].OECD官方网站[2009-7-20].http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx. 被引量:1
  • 5中国国际贸易促进委员会驻法国代表处.法国药品注册程序和监管体制[N].中国中医药报,2003-08-14. 被引量:1
  • 6Jaillon P.The control of prescription drug advertising:A controversial issue[J].Clinical pharmacology & therapeutics,2000,68(6):583-585. 被引量:1
  • 7Ganse E V,Becquart V,Stamm C etal.Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Information[EB/OL].Brussels:European Commission,Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General and Austrian Ministry of Health,Family and Youth,2007[2009-7-15].http://ppri.oebig.at/Downloads/Results/France_PPRI_2007.pdf. 被引量:1
  • 8Paris V.Pharmaceutical regulation in France1980-2003[J].International Journal of Health Planning and Management,2005(20):307-328. 被引量:1
  • 9G-BA. Reference prices and how they are set [ EB/OL]. [ 2015-01-23 ]. https://www, g-ba. de/institution/themen- schwerpunkte/arzneimittel/festbetrag/. 被引量:1
  • 10G-BA. Decisions on Healthcare Benefits[ EB/OL]. [2014- 10-23 ]. http://www, english, g-ba. de/structure/. 被引量:1

共引文献68

同被引文献113

引证文献10

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部