摘要
【目的/意义】对比分析不同学科分类体系下的学科结构,研究学科分类体系对学科结构画像的影响。【方法/过程】以国内42所双一流建设高校为例,对比分析WOS、ESI、SCADC2和CT2四种分类体系下同一年度机构间和同一机构年度间的学科均衡度和学科结构相似度的一致性和差异度。【结果/结论】在学科均衡度方面,不同学科分类体系下的机构学科均衡性具有一定的一致性,其中WOS、ESI和CT2三种分类体系下的一致性较高;根据不同分类体系得到的高校学科均衡性可能存在截然相反的发展趋势。在学科结构相似度方面,四种分类体系虽粒度不同,但基于学科结构相似性得到的高校聚类结果具有较高的一致性,均能较好反映不同类型高校的学科结构特征;但是在反映年度间学科结构变化方面,细粒度的学科分类体系能起到更好的揭示作用。【创新/局限】需要使用更多的指标,在更多的层面进行对比分析。
[Purpose/significance]To compare the disciplinary structure under dfferent subject classification systems,and to study the influence of subject classification system on the disciplinary structure profiling.[Method/process]Taking 42 universities in China as examples,the consistency and difference of disciplinary balance and disciplinary structure similarity between institutions in the same year,and that in different years of the same institution under WOS,ESI,SCADC2 and C2 classification systems were compared.[Result/conclusion]In terms of disciplinary balance,the disciplinary balance of institutions under different discipline classification systems has a certain consistency,among which WOS,ESI and CT2 classification systems have a high consistency.According to different classification systems,the disciplinary balance of universities may have the opposite trend of development.In the aspect of disciplinary structure similarity,although the four classification systems have different granularity,the cluster results based on disciplinary structure similarity have high consistency,and can reflect the disciplinary structure characteristics of different types of universities.However,the fine-grained subject classification system can better reveal the disciplinary structure change.[Innovation/limitation]The study needs to use more indicators and carry out comparative analysis at more levels.
作者
耿海英
张建东
杨立英
沈哲思
GENG Haiying;ZHANG Jiandong;YANG Liying;SHEN Zhesi(National Science Library,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China;Department of Information Resources Management,School of Economics and Management,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China;Chinese Academy of Social Science Evaluation Studies,Beijing 100732,China)
出处
《情报科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第10期83-90,120,共9页
Information Science
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“数据驱动学科分类体系的构建及其在社会科学评价中的应用研究”(22BTQ018)。
关键词
学科分类体系
学科结构
学科均衡性
学科相似性
引文主题
subject classification system
disciplinary structure
disciplinary balance
disciplinary structure similarity
citation topics
