摘要
生活资料仅仅是基于唯物主义来理解工资的前提,雇佣工资呈现的本质是劳动力价值,工资形式的本质则是价值形式的知和行。对工资的深入剖解可使我们了解到《资本论》并存的两条逻辑线索:资本逻辑和主体逻辑。《资本论》中异化劳动的资本逻辑和异化劳动的主体逻辑是统一的,并促成商品—货币—资本逻辑下的算法统治和阶级剥削形成价值形式的统治场。研究继而显示,《资本论》的工资范畴包括“工资恶”和“工资镜”两重意义。这种对比表明:马克思对工资的政治经济学批判属于主体论的范畴建构,而非知识论的概念解释,而这也是对资产阶级三位一体公式批判的方法论寓意所在。因为当资产阶级将无产阶级置于资本工资这一陷阱中时,工资的“财产幻象”便已掩盖了一切实质性内容。正如剥削不是知识,工资也不是知识。为了走出工资的“财产”幻象,应注重分析主体行动,而非工资的概念解读。
The means of livelihood are only a prerequisite for understanding wages based on materialism.The wages of employees are essentially the value of labor power,and the essence of wage forms is the knowl-edge and action of value forms.An in-depth analysis of wages can reveal two coexistent logical clues:the log-ic of capital and the logic of subject,in the Capital.The logic of capital and the logic of subject are unified for alienated labor in the Capital and promote algorithmic ruling and class exploitation under the commodity-cur-rency-capital logic to form a ruling field of value forms.Furthermore,the wage in the Capital has two mean-ings:"wage evil"and"wage mirror."This comparison indicates that Marx's political and economic criticism of wages belongs to the category of subjectivity theory rather than the conceptual interpretation of epistemology,which is the methodological implication of criticizing the trinity formula.Because when the bourgeoisie places the proletariat in the trap of capital wages,the property illusion of wages covers all the substantive content.Just as neither exploitation nor wages are knowledge.To break the property illusion of wages,attention should be paid to analyzing the actions of the subject rather than interpreting the concept of wages.
作者
许光伟
XU Guangwei(School of Economics,Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics,Nanchang Jiangxi 330013)
出处
《经济纵横》
北大核心
2023年第10期11-23,F0002,共14页
Economic Review Journal
基金
江西省高校人文社会科学研究项目(编号:JJ21119)的成果。
