摘要
当前中国涉外法治研究的主体性发展陷入“既自我认同又自我否定”的困境中。西方以“全球化”和“现代化”为名主导国际法治并温和渗透到中国涉外法治知识体系。在此影响下,中国学界开始自我东方化:一方面认为中国与西方在涉外治理上的差异是一种“落后”,这种认识激发了强烈的主体性意识和进步意愿;另一方面,在建设中国涉外法治时,又因“落后”情结而认为中国本土缺少可行的知识资源,只能依赖西方,而西方知识资源的长期影响又抑制了中国自主创新的动力和能力。摆脱这种困境应当立足于中国实际,接纳和吸收来自西方的、本土的以及非西方国家的涉外法治理论与经验,形成多元化的涉外法治知识资源格局。
The current development of subjectivity is facing a dilemma:the coexistence of self-identification and selfdenial.In the name of Globalization and Modernization,the West leads the international rule of law and gradually penetrates into the building of Chinese foreign-related legal knowledge system.With this infuence,the Chinese academia is self-Orientalized.On the one hand,scholars believe that the differences between China and the West in terms of foreign-related governance indicate an underdevelopment,which stimulates a strong Chinese consciousness and a willingness to develop;One the other hand,when developing China's own picture of foreign-related rule of law,scholars deny indigenous sources and heavily rely on Western sources--but the strong influence of Western sources in turn restrains the motivation and capability of theoretical innovation.A solution for the dilemma is breaking away from self-orientalization and constructing a pluralist system based on China's national conditions,namely Chinese foreignrelated legal research should absorb any knowledge sources contributing to the development of Chinese foreign-related rule of law,no matter they are Western,indigenous or non-Western.
出处
《学术月刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第11期95-109,共15页
Academic Monthly
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目“跨文明视阈下中国国际司法观的形成与演变研究”(23BFX144)的阶段性成果。
关键词
中国涉外法治研究
主体性
困境
自我东方化
多元化格局
Chinese foreign-related rule of law
subjectivity
dilemma
self-Orientalization
pluralist system
