摘要
利用劣质碳氮源大豆秸秆代替优质碳氮源牛肉膏和蛋白胨,强化微生物脱色偶氮染料活性黑5,采用Miseq高通量测序技术对脱色过程中的微生物群落结构进行分析。研究结果表明,大豆秸秆为唯一碳氮源时,混合菌群对50 mg/L活性黑5溶液的脱色率为51.84%,表明具有较好的脱色效果。Miseq高通量测序分析结果显示,经过大豆秸秆强化作用,鲍特菌属(Bordetella)成为最优势菌种,说明大豆秸秆可以为鲍特菌属(Bordetella)提供良好的生存环境。研究结果为今后利用大豆秸秆强化微生物处理实际染料废水效果提供理论依据。
Poor quality carbon and nitrogen source soybean straw was used to enhance the microbial decolorization of azo dye Reactive Black 5,instead of high quality carbon and nitrogen source beef extract and peptone,and the microbial community structure during decolorization process was analyzed by using Miseq high-throughput sequencing technology.The results showed that when soybean straw was the only carbon and nitrogen source,the decolorization rate of azo dye Reactive Black 5(50 mg/L)by mixed bacteria flora was 51.84%,indicating a better decolorization effect.The results of Miseq high-throughput sequencing analysis showed that after the enhancing effect of soybean straw,Bordetella became the most dominant bacteria,indicating that soybean straw could provide a good living environment for Bordetella.A theoretical basis was provided for the future use of soybean straw to enhance the microbial treatment effect of actual dyeing wastewater.
作者
郭庆贤
刘娜
刘鑫
韩娟
陆招娣
尹云美
韩亚芬
谢学辉
GUO Qing-xian;LIU Na;LIU Xin;HAN Juan;LU Zhao-di;YIN Yun-mei;HAN Ya-fen;XIE Xue-hui(School of Environment and Surveying Engineering,Suzhou University,Anhui Suzhou 234000;Research Center of Non-point Source Pollution Control and Ecological Remediation Technology of Tuohe River Basin,Suzhou University,Anhui Suzhou 234000;College of Environmental Science and Engineering,Donghua University,Shanghai 201620;Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security,Shanghai 200092,China)
出处
《广州化工》
CAS
2023年第13期46-49,共4页
GuangZhou Chemical Industry
基金
安徽省大学生创新创业训练计划项目(S202110379104)
安徽省教育厅科学研究项目资助(KJ2021A1105)
安徽省高校优秀青年人才支持计划项目(gxyq2022104)
宿州学院第四批优秀学术技术骨干(2020XJGG06)
校级教学研究项目(szxy2021ksjy01)
地理信息与能源农业现代产业学院(szxy2021cyxy06)。
关键词
大豆秸秆
脱色
碳氮源
群落结构
soybean straw
decolorization
carbon and nitrogen source
community structure