摘要
文学与地图的共性探索乃文学地图学跨学科逻辑构建的重要学术议题,但受制于传统的学科割据思维及专业细分的概念窠臼,两种门类的学理关联研究非常薄弱,由此构成了本研究的选题缘起。在历史稽考和文史互证的基础上,首先采用媒介符号学的批评策略,从文字表象及形而上的象征符号两方面,对文学与地图的表征媒介展开探究;然后结合列斐伏尔的社会空间“三元辩证法”和克莱恩的地图空间表征三法,探索文学与地图的生产共性。研究发现,文学与地图中的文字乃意义表征至关重要的文化语码,并与图形一起构建了更大的(自我)指涉象征系统;在文学与地图皆涉及的空间生产方面,推崇特定的价值观念和书写空间记忆乃作者权威的体现,空间实践、空间表征和空间象征的文学书写流程则与地图的空间测量、空间显现和空间叙事存在隐喻共性,文学地图学的关联逻辑由此建立:只有当文字与图形并行、摹仿与象征共处时,空间符号才有意义,叙事才有价值。认识到文学与地图的表征关联、生产共性及空间本质,既是建构文学地图学本体论的重要一步,同时也为文学地图的批评实践开辟了道路,因而具有不可忽略的学理意义。
The exploration of the commonalities between literature and maps constitutes a significant academic topic within the interdisciplinary logic of literary cartography.However,hindered by the conventional disciplinary segregation and the confines of specialized subdivisions,the research on the theoretical correlation between these two fields remains exceedingly scant.Building upon a foundation of historical investigation and the mutual validation of literature and historical records,this research initially employs a critical strategy derived from semiotics,specifically focusing on the representation of literature and maps as mediated symbols.It examines both the textual manifestations and the metaphysical symbolic aspects,aiming to explore the expressive media of literature and maps.Subsequently,by incorporating trio-dialectics of Henri Lefebvre's Social Space and Bernhard Klein's Trio-representations of Space,this study delves into the shared production characteristics of literature and maps.The research reveals that the written word in literature and maps functions as a crucial cultural code of meaning representation,collaborating with visual elements to construct a larger system of(self)referential symbolism.Regarding the production of space,which encompasses both literature and maps,the endorsement of specific values and the inscription of spatial memory signify the authorial authority.The literary processes of spatial practice,spatial representation,and spatial symbolism coexist metaphorically with the spatial measurement,spatial manifestation,and spatial narrative in cartography.Consequently,the interrelated logic of literary cartography is established:only when words and graphics operate in parallel,imitating and symbolizing each other,can spatial symbols attain significance and narratives acquire value.Recognizing the representational correlation,shared production characteristics,and spatial essence of literature and maps,is not only a crucial step in constructing the ontological framework of literary cartog
出处
《广东外语外贸大学学报》
2023年第6期66-76,共11页
Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
基金
国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“文学地图学原理”(14FWW003)。
关键词
文学
地图
共性
表征媒介
空间生产
literature
map
similarity
representational medium
spatial production
