期刊文献+

合成MRI鉴别乳腺环形强化病变良恶性的应用价值 被引量:3

Application value of synthetic MRI in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breastlesions with peripheral rim enhancement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨合成MRI(synthetic MRI, syMRI)技术在鉴别乳腺环形强化病变良恶性中的价值。材料与方法 收集MRI检查显示乳腺环形强化病例52个,共54个病灶,MRI检查包括平扫、增强syMRI MAGiC (magnetic resonance image complication)序列、扩散加权成像、动态对比增强MRI,MRI检查后1周内行手术或穿刺并取得病理结果。经syMRI后处理软件测量肿块增强前的T1(T1pre)、增强前的T2(T2pre)、增强前的质子密度(proton density, PD)值(PDpre)以及增强后的T1(T1post)、增强后的T2(T2post)、增强后的PD值(PDpost),计算增强前后的T1相对变化率(ΔT1%)、T2相对变化率(ΔT2%)、 PD值相对变化率(ΔPD%),测量乳腺环形强化病变环壁以及环内的表观扩散系数(apparentdiffusion coefficient, ADC)值。将病例根据病理结果分为良性组和恶性组,采用独立样本t检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验,分析上述syMRI定量值、ADC值在良恶性组别间的差异(P<0.05),采用χ2/Fisher精确检验分析良恶性组别间对比增强成像上的影像特征[形态、边缘、时间-信号强度曲线(time signal intensity curve, TIC)]的差异,将差异有统计学意义的参数分别使用logistic回归建立单因素及多因素预测模型,绘制ROC曲线并进行DeLong检验评价预测模型的诊断效能。结果 54个病灶中,恶性42个、良性12个。良性组T2pre [101.17 (28.42)]高于恶性组T2pre [88.67 (21.75)],良性组PDpost(101.90±14.60)大于恶性组PDpost(84.90±20.00),良性组与恶性组之间TIC类型(P<0.001)、环壁ADC值(P<0.001)的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),PDpost的ROC曲线下面积(area under the curve, AUC)为0.763,高于T2pre(AUC=0.758),低于TIC类型(AUC=0.883)、环壁ADC值(AUC=0.901)。上述参数单独应用时,环壁ADC值的诊断效能最高,参数联合应用时,四者联合的多因素模型诊断效能最高(AUC=0.998),TIC类型、T2pre、PDpost作为单因素模型,其诊断效能与四者联合的多因素模型诊断效能的差异具有� Objective:To explore the application value of synthetic MRI(syMRI)in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions with peripheral rim enhancement.Materials and Methods:A total of 52 patients(54 breast lesions with peripheral rim enhancement)which underwent MRI examination were included in the study.All subjects underwent plain scan and enhanced scan of syMRI,diffusion weighted imaging scan and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging MRI(DCE-MRI)scan,and then all of them received pathology results by surgery or biopsy within one week after MRI examination.The T1,T2,PD values of breast lesions pre-contrast and post-contrast injection(T1pre,T2pre,and PDpre;T1post,T2post,and PDpost)were estimated from syMRI data by using syMRI post-processing software.The relative change rate was calculated(ΔT1%,ΔT2%,ΔPD%).The apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC)values of the ring wall and inside the ring were measured.According to the result of pathology,all lesions were divided into benign and malignant groups.Independent sample t-test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to analyze whether the data were significantly different(P<0.05).Theχ2 test or Fisher exact test were used to analyze the image features of DCE-MRI[morphology,edge and time-signal intensity curve(TIC)].Logistic regression was used to establish single-factor and multi-factor prediction models for statistically significant parameters,and the ROC curve of the subjects was drawn and the diagnosis efficiency of the prediction model was evaluated by DeLong test.Results:In 54 lesions,malignant 42 cases,12 cases were benign.The T2pre of benign groups[101.17(28.42)]higher than malignant group[88.67(21.75)],the PDpost of benign groups(101.90±14.60)higher than malignant group(84.90±20.00).There were significant differences in TIC(P<0.001)and the ADC values of the ring wall(P<0.001)between benign and malignant groups(P<0.05).The area under the curve(AUC)of PDpost was 0.763 and higher than T2pre(AUC=0.758),lower than TIC(AUC=0.883)and the ADC values of the
作者 童秋云 余雪燕 李迅 蒋宇 戴文海 周智鹏 TONG Qiuyun;YU Xueyan;LI Xun;JIANG Yu;DAI Wenhai;ZHOU Zhipeng(Department of Medical Imaging,Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University,Guilin 541001,China)
出处 《磁共振成像》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2023年第10期78-83,共6页 Chinese Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
基金 广西自筹经费科研课题项目(编号:Z20201476)。
关键词 乳腺 环形强化 鉴别诊断 合成磁共振成像 磁共振成像 breast peripheral rim enhancement differential diagnosis synthetic magnetic resonance imaging magnetic resonance imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献125

  • 1孟铁豹,刘辉明,张蔚菁,何浩强,尹国平,权光南,张英魁,谢传淼.集成磁共振成像弛豫时间定量在前列腺癌诊断中的应用[J].临床放射学杂志,2020,39(3):605-608. 被引量:16
  • 2周世崇,范亦武,曾炜,丁建辉,陈敏,王伯华,邱月芳,高毅,张迅,常才.上海社区乳腺癌筛查初步小结:超声及乳腺X线的漏诊、误诊病例分析[J].上海医学影像,2012,21(4):291-293. 被引量:4
  • 3马恒敏,王圣芳,冷玲,朱峰,李琰琰,史思达,左文述,王家林.山东省肥城市2008-2011年乳腺癌筛查结果分析[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2013,20(2):88-92. 被引量:11
  • 4Caivano R, ViUonio A, DAntuono F, et al. Diffusion weighted ima- ging and apparent diffusion coefficient in 3 tesla magnetic resonance imaging of breast lesions[ J]. Cancer Invest,2015,33:159-164. 被引量:1
  • 5Tozaki M, Igarashi T, Fukuda K. Positive and negative predictive val- ues of BI-RADS-MRI descriptors for focal breast masses [ J ]. Magn Resort Med Sci,2006,5:7-15. 被引量:1
  • 6Kobayashi M, Kawashima H, Matsui O, et al. Two different types of ring-like enhancement on dynamic MR imaging in breast cancer:cor- relation with the histopathologic findings [ J ]. J Magn Reson Ima- ging,2008,28 : 1435-1443. 被引量:1
  • 7Wu LM, Hu JN, Gu HY, et al. Can diffusion-weighted MR imaging and contrast-enhanced MR imaging precisely evaluate and predict pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer? [ J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2012,135 : 17-28. 被引量:1
  • 8Stomper PC, Herman S, Klippenstein DL, et al. Suspect breast le- sions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging corre- lated with mammographic and pathologic features [ J ]. Radiology, 1995,197:387-395. 被引量:1
  • 9Zhang L, Tang M, Min Z, et al. Accuracy of combined dynamic con- trast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging for breast cancer detection: a meta-analysis[ J]. Acta Radi- o1,2016,57:651-660. 被引量:1
  • 10裴广军,付莉,崔亚玲,王文雷,高利华,陆维权.中国女性乳腺癌危险因素的Meta分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2008,23(19):2650-2652. 被引量:19

共引文献1158

同被引文献25

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部