摘要
目的研究刺血拔罐对脑出血后肢体痉挛的意义。方法60例脑出血后肢体痉挛患者,随机分为对照组及试验组,每组30例。对照组采取临床常规干预,试验组在对照组的基础上采取刺血拔罐治疗。比较两组患者的上肢痉挛情况,上肢被动牵拉力评分及上肢运动功能评分,临床疗效。结果试验组患者的上肢痉挛情况优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(Z=2.745,P<0.05)。试验组患者的上肢被动牵拉力评分(6.22±0.33)分、上肢运动功能评分(73.02±7.62)分均高于对照组的(3.14±0.14)、(51.09±4.45)分,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组患者的临床总有效率83.33%高于对照组的50.00%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论刺血拔罐对脑出血后肢体痉挛患者的临床效果显著,可以改善患者的临床症状,值得推广。
Objective To study the significance of blood-pricking and cupping on limb spasticity after cerebral hemorrhage.Methods A total of 60 patients with limb spasticity after cerebral hemorrhage were randomly divided into control group and experimental group,with 30 cases in each group.The control group received routine clinical intervention,and the experimental group received blood-pricking and cupping based on the control group.The upper limb spasticity,the upper limb passive pulling score,the upper limb motor function score and the clinical efficacy of the two groups were compared.Results The upper limb spasticity in the experimental group was better than that in the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(Z=2.745,P<0.05).The upper limb passive pulling score of(6.22±0.33)points and upper limb motor function score of(73.02±7.62)points in the experimental group were higher than those of(3.14±0.14)and(51.09±4.45)points in the control group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The total clinical effective rate of the experimental group was 83.33%,which was higher than that of 50.00%of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion The clinical effect of blood-pricking and cupping on patients with limb spasticity after intracerebral hemorrhage is significant,and the clinical symptoms of patients are improved,which is worth popularizing.
作者
尹华伟
YIN Hua-wei(Dalian Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Dalian 116001,China)
出处
《中国现代药物应用》
2023年第17期173-176,共4页
Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
关键词
刺血拔罐
脑出血
肢体痉挛
Blood-pricking and cupping
Cerebral hemorrhage
Limb spasticity
