摘要
县域的包容性增长是破解新时代三农问题,全面推进乡村振兴的重要实现路径。研究基于2015年和2020年县域数据,从经济增长、社会发展和共同富裕三个维度构建县域包容性增长评价指标体系,运用熵权TOPSIS法、Kernel核密度估计、泰尔指数等方法对县域包容性增长水平进行了测度和分析。研究发现:(1)2015—2020年中国县域包容性增长水平呈上升趋势,呈现东部>中部>东北>西部的格局。从增长速度来看,东北和西部地区的增速领先于东部地区和中部地区。脱贫县及国家乡村振兴重点帮扶县的包容性增长水平落后于全国均值水平。(2)2015—2020年中国县域包容性增长水平总体差异减小。其中,区域内部差异是其主要来源。(3)县域包容性增长水平呈现“东部地区高水平差异、中西部地区低水平均衡”状态。对东部和西部差异来源分解发现,东部地区差异主要来自于省际差异,西部地区差异则主要来自于省内差异。(4)障碍因子识别结果显示,每万人社会福利收养性单位床位数、规模以上工业企业数量、人均公共预算收入、二三产业从业人员占总人口比例、每万人医疗机构床位数以及农村居民人均可支配收入占人均GDP比例是当前县域包容性增长的主要障碍指标。在此基础上,研究从发展壮大县域经济、扩展和提升农户发展机会、增强产业发展的包容性以及统筹推进县域协调发展方面提出了对乡村振兴的启示与相关建议。
Inclusive growth in counties is an important realization path to reslove the rural issues in the New Era and comprehensively promote rural revitalization.Based on the county data in 2015 and 2020,this paper constructs a county inclusive growth evaluation index system from the three dimensions of economic growth,social development,and common prosperity.The study uses the entropy-weighted TOPSIS method,kernel density estimation,and Thiel index to analyze the level of inclusive growth in counties.The research finds that:(1)From 2015 to 2020,the inclusive growth level of counties in China showed an upward trend,presenting a pattern of eastern>central>northeastern>western region.In terms of growth rate,the northeastern and western regions are ahead of the eastern and central regions.The inclusive growth level of poverty alleviation counties and key counties assisted by the national rural revitalization was below the national average.(2)The overall difference in the level of inclusive growth in China's counties between 2015 and 2020 decreased from 0.0364 to 0.0258,with intra-regional differences being the main source.In terms of dimensions,the economic growth has the largest variation,while the social development and common prosperity variation have the smaller variation.(3)The inclusive growth level of the county shows a pattern of"high-level difference in the eastern region and low-level balance in the central and western regions".The decomposition of the sources of differences between the east and the west shows that the differences in the eastern region mainly come from inter-provincial differences,and the differences in the western region mainly come from intra-provincial differences.(4)The identification results of obstacle factors show that the number of beds of social welfare adoption units per 10000 people,the number of industrial enterprises above designated size,the per capita public budget revenue,the proportion of employees in the secondary and tertiary industries in the total population,the number of beds
作者
林万龙
米晶
LIN Wan-long;MI Jing(College of Economics and Management,China Agricultural University,Beijing 100083,China)
出处
《自然资源学报》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2023年第8期2117-2134,共18页
Journal of Natural Resources
基金
国家自然科学基金委应急管理项目(7214100349)
国家社会科学基金重大项目(20ZDA073)。
关键词
县域
包容性增长
乡村振兴
区域差异
障碍因素
county
inclusive growth
rural revitalization
regional differences
obstacle factors
