摘要
2012年修订的《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》将“再审检察建议”与“抗诉”正式确立为两种法定的监督方式,依据现行法律规定,两者目的相同,适用范围重合,致使实践中各地各级检察院法院各行其道,司法资源和司法权威随之折损。为实现再审检察建议与抗诉功能效益的最大化,学界对其适用范围提出了“平行适用”和“先后适用”两种模式。通过对现行立法规则的解读以及实践运行状况的考察,文章提出构建“再审检察建议置前,抗诉置后保障”的二阶化监督模式,同时辅之以相关配套措施,打造“刚柔相济”的再审检察建议及良性互动机制,以全面实现检察监督的精准化、高效化。
The revised Civil Procedure Law in 2012 officially established the“retrial procuratorial proposal”and“protest”as two legal supervision methods.According to the current law,both of them have the same purpose and their scope of application coincides,resulting in a situation where procuratorates and courts at all levels go their own way in practice,thus damaging judicial resources and judicial authority.In order to maximize the benefits of the retrial procuratorial proposal and protest function,the academic world presents two modes of“parallel application”and“successive application”.Through the interpretation of the current legislative rules and the inspection of operation status of practice,this paper tries to build the two-stage supervision mode of“retrial procuratorial proposal before,protest security after”.At the same time,relevant supporting measures are supplemented to create a retrial procuratorial proposal combining“vigor and suppleness”and benign interaction mechanism,so as to fully realize the precision and efficiency of procuratorial supervision.
作者
朱逸安
ZHU Yian(Law school,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872)
出处
《丽水学院学报》
2023年第4期15-24,共10页
Journal of Lishui University
关键词
民事检察监督
民事再审
再审检察建议
抗诉
civil procuratorial supervision
civil retrial
retrial procuratorial proposal
protest
