摘要
研究对比输尿管结石采用输尿管镜钬激光碎石取石术、体外冲击波碎石术治疗的临床效果。选择2020年1月—2022年12月昆山市中西医结合医院泌尿外科收治的80例输尿管结石患者为研究对象,以随机数字表法将其分成对照组和研究组,各40例。对照组予体外冲击波碎石术,研究组予输尿管镜钬激光碎石取石术。对比两组手术效果。结果显示,两组手术指标、结石直径>1cm总有效率、术后1d炎症因子水平、氧化应激反应、并发症总发生率和生活质量比较,研究组患者的相关指标表现更好且差异均具备统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究发现,输尿管镜钬激光碎石取石术治疗输尿管结石的整体效果优于体外冲击波碎石术,值得临床推广。
Study and compare the clinical effects of ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of ureteral stones.From January 2020 to December 2022,80 patients with ureteral calculi who were admitted to the Urology of Kunshan Integrated Hospital of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine were selected as the subjects of study.The control group received extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy,while the study group received ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy.Compare the surgical outcomes between the two groups.The results showed that there were statistically signifi cant differences between the two groups in surgical indicators,total effective rate with stone diameter greater than 1cm,levels of infl ammatory factors on the first day after surgery,oxidative stress response,total incidence of complications,and quality of life(P<0.05).Research has found that the overall effect of ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for the treatment of ureteral stones is superior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy,and is worthy of clinical promotion.
作者
马效伦
MA Xiaolun(Kunshan Integrated Hospital of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine,Kunshan,Jiangsu 215300)
出处
《科技与健康》
2023年第4期25-28,共4页
Technology and Health
关键词
钬激光碎石取石
炎症反应
输尿管结石
体外冲击波碎石
holmium laser lithotripsy
inflammatory response
ureteral calculi
extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
