摘要
以往关于思维的解释表现为功能话语,即总是在思维的结果或功能显现上去言说思维,未曾追究致成那些思维功能的思维之内在存在结构,合乎存在逻辑地发展一条从思维结构到思维功能的理论探索道路。结构是功能的根据,单纯的功能话语不可能提供对于思维的彻底理解。本文以思的直接现实是意识为根据,把关于意识存在结构之哲学分析的基本论断作为逻辑起点,演绎式地展开关于思维的内在构成分析,系统地构造揭示思维本质的结构话语。在其中,以特定构成形式、逻辑形式和显现形式为本质的存在概念占据思维发生的基础地位。思维被描述为意识按照内在于自己的存在概念来发现非存在和设问,继而在存在概念的本质向待思内容的支配性使用中规定和推动创造存在的活动。
In the past,the interpretation of thinking was expressed as functional discourse,that is,thinking was always expressed in terms of the results of thinking or the manifestation of the function of thinking,but never did we investigate the inherent existing structure of thinking that led to those thinking functions,nor logically developed a line from the structure of thinking to the function of thinking by which the theory about thinking might be constructed.Structure is the basis of function,and purely functional discourse cannot provide a thorough understanding of thinking.Based on the fact that the direct reality of thinking is consciousness,this paper takes the basic assertion of the philosophical analysis of the existing structure of consciousness as a logical starting point,deductively expands the analysis of the internal composition of thinking,and systematically constructs a structural discourse that reveals the essence of thinking.In it,the concept of Being with a specific constitutive form,a logical form and an expressive form as its essence,occupies the basic position of the occurrence of thinking,and thinking is described as the activity through which consciousness discovers non-being and asks questions according to the concept of Being within itself,and then prescribes and promotes the creation of presence by letting the essence of the concept of Being govern the content to be thought.
作者
崔平
CUI Ping(Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234,China)
出处
《云南大学学报(社会科学版)》
2023年第4期15-23,共9页
The Journal of Yunnan University:Social Sciences Edition
基金
国家社科基金课题一般项目“文化气质与文化竞争力关系的哲学研究”(项目号:18BZX014)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
意识存在结构
存在概念
思的冲动
功能话语
结构话语
existential structure of consciousness
concept of Being:impulse of thought
functional discourse
structural discourse