摘要
【目的】评价河北塞罕坝森林公园植物景观质量,为科学构建和评价公园植物景观提供理论依据。【方法】对塞罕坝森林公园进行实地勘查,选取较为典型的梨乡花海景区、“金莲映日”景区、“七星湖假鼠妇草湿地公园”景区以及“泰丰湖”景区为主要调研区域,并从中筛选出40个植物景观单元作为研究对象。同时,围绕森林公园植物景观结构要素、美学要素、组成要素以及观赏心理要素4个维度构建评价指标体系,并利用AHP法和SBE法计算40个景观单元的评分指数,划分对应评分等级。【结果】1)塞罕坝森林公园植物景观质量评价体系各准则层权重大小依次为景观结构要素(0.335)>景观美学要素(0.265)>观赏心理因素(0.203)>景观组成要素(0.197),表明在构建塞罕坝森林公园植物景观过程中,应当将规划重点置于景观植物结构以及植物景观美学表达方面,并辅以丰富多样化植物景观搭配;2)塞罕坝森林公园植物景观的AHP法评价结果表明,有20个优质景观,16个较好景观,4个适中景观,没有较差景观和劣质景观。SBE法评价结果显示所有景观单元中植物美景度高的景观有13个,较高景观11个,中等14个,较低和低分别为2个和0个。整体来看,塞罕坝森林公园的植物景观较为良好;3)经Kendall’s W协和系数对AHP法和SBE法所计算出的评价结果予以检验,结果表明二者结果具备较高的一致性,该方法可显著提升植物景观评价科学性。【结论】运用SBE方法与AHP方法对河北塞罕坝森林公园植物景观质量进行评价,分析对比两种评价结果差异,为河北塞罕坝森林公园植物景观评价提供新思路。
【Objective】By evaluating the plant landscape quality of Saihanba Forest Park in Hebei Province,this article aimed to provide a theoretical basis for the scientific construction and evaluation of the plant landscape in the park.【Method】The field survey of Saihanba Forest Park was carried out,and the typical Lixiang huahai scenic spot,“Jinlian yingri”scenic spot,“Qixing lake jiashufucao wetland park”scenic spot and“Taifeng lake”scenic spot were selected as the main research areas,from which 40 plant landscape units were selected as the research objects.At the same time,this paper constructed the evaluation index system based on the four dimensions of plant landscape structural elements,aesthetic elements,constituent elements and ornamental psychological elements of forest parks,and used the AHP method and SBE method to calculate the score index of the 40 landscape units and divide the corresponding score levels.【Result】1)The weight of each criterion layer of the plant landscape quality evaluation system of Saihanba Forest Park was landscape structure element(0.335)>landscape aesthetic element(0.265)>ornamental psychological factor(0.203)>landscape component element(0.197),indicating that in the process of constructing the plant landscape of Saihanba Forest Park,the plan should be focused on landscape plant structure and plant landscape aesthetic expression,which was supplemented by rich and diversified plant landscape collocation.2)The AHP evaluation results of the plant landscape in Saihanba Forest Park showed that there were 20 high-quality landscapes,16 good landscapes and 4 moderate landscapes,and there was no inferior landscape and poor landscape.The evaluation results based on the SBE method showed that among all landscape units,there were 13 landscapes with high plant beauty,11 landscapes with relatively high plant beauty,14 landscapes with medium plant beauty,2 landscapes with relatively low plant beauty and 0 landscapes with low plant beauty.On the whole,the plant landscape of Saiha
作者
葛楠
李鸿祥
曹峰
GE Nan;LI Hongxiang;CAO Feng(College of Arts and Design,Hebei Institute of Communications,Shijiazhuang 051430,Hebei,China;College of Landscape Architecture and Tourism,Hebei Agricultural University,Baoding 071000,Hebei,China)
出处
《中南林业科技大学学报》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2023年第4期182-190,共9页
Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology
基金
河北省文化艺术科学规划和旅游研究项目(HB20-QN028)
国家自然科学基金项目(61103149)。
