摘要
2021年修改通过的《民事诉讼法》以繁简分流为指针对民事诉讼程序进行了重要修正,此次修法以一审审判程序的重新配置与独任制的扩张适用为重心,以期整体上提升民事诉讼程序效率。解绑审判程序与审判组织、扩张独任制适用范围等立法选择固然值得肯定,但繁简分流改革并未遵循应有的制度逻辑,导致在我国民事诉讼中,繁简分流的起点设计失之允当、小额诉讼改革方向错误、程序简化与程序保障间局部失衡。繁简分流改革若想真正取得成效应遵循双重制度逻辑,一方面根据案件所涉实体利益大小对一审审判程序进行分层,另一方面根据案件自身性质对审判组织进行划分。
The Civil Procedure Law,amended and passed in 2021,makes important amendments to civil procedure based on the division of complex and simplified procedures,and this amendment focuses on the reconfiguration of first-in-stance trial procedures and the expansion and application of the sole judge system,in order to improve the efficiency of civil litigation procedures as a whole.Although legislative choices,such as unbinding trial procedures and trial organizations,and expanding the scope of application of the sole judge system,are certainly worthy of recognition,the reform of dividing complex and simplified procedures does not fllow the proper institutional logic,resulting in a number of issues in civil liti-gation in China:misguided design of the starting point of dividing complex and simplified procedures,the wrong direction of reform for cases involving small claims,and a partial imbalance between procedural simplification and procedural support.If the reform of dividing complex and simplified procedures is meant to achieve real success,it should follow the dual sys-tem logic;on the one hand,the first-instance trial procedure is layered according to the size of the substantive interests in-volved in the case;on the other hand,the trial organization should be divided according to the nature of the case itself.
作者
占善刚
曹影
ZHAN Shan-gang;CAO Ying(Law School,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)
出处
《江苏行政学院学报》
北大核心
2023年第2期130-136,共7页
The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute
基金
高校人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“新时代生态文明建设司法保障与服务的完善研究”(22JJD820014)的阶段性成果。
关键词
繁简分流
一审审判程序
审判组织
独任制
小额诉讼程序
简易程序
dividing complex and simplified procedures
first-instance trial procedures
trial organization
sole judge system
small claims proceedings
simplified procedure
