期刊文献+

异步审理模式的诉讼效率分析——基于杭州互联网法院的实证研究 被引量:2

Ananalysis of the lawsuit efficiency of asynchronous trial pattern:an empirical study based on Hangzhou Internet court
下载PDF
导出
摘要 异步审理模式基于其在时间和空间上的“非同步”性与坚持“直接言词原则”的传统诉讼模式形成了鲜明对比。关于异步审理模式对诉讼效率的影响问题,使用最小二乘法和倾向得分匹配法实证分析了杭州互联网法院5 714份裁判文书,得出以下结论:首先,采用异步审理模式的案件相较于非异步审理的案件显著提高了15.8%的诉讼效率。基于高效与便捷两种优势,异步审理模式对于当事人接近正义具有积极作用。其次,异步审理模式对于不同案件类型的诉讼效率具有异质性。现阶段,异步审理司法实践更多适用于以银行为主体的借款纠纷。为更好发挥异步审理模式的制度功能,一方面应当明确异步审理模式的适用群体为弱势自然人群体并加强其认知度;另一方面,在诉讼标的额上限定适用异步审理模式的案件范围,突出异步审理模式的非普适性,以减少异步审理模式对于民事诉讼程序正义价值的冲击。 The asynchronous trialpattern,based on its“non synchronization”in time and space,is in sharp contrast to the traditional lawsuit pattern that adheres to the“direct verbal principle”.On the impact of asynchronous trial pattern on lawsuit efficiency,an empirical analysis using the least square method and propensity score matching method was conducted on 5714 adjudication documents of the Hangzhou Internet Court.Firstly,cases using asynchronous trial pattern significantly improved lawsuit efficiency by 15.8%compared to non asynchronous trial cases.Based on the advantages of efficiency and convenience,the asynchronous trial pattern has a positive effect on the parties′access to justice.Secondly,the asynchronous trial pattern has heterogeneity in the lawsuit efficiency of different case types.At this stage,the judicial practice of asynchronous trial is more applicable to loan disputes dominated by banks.To better leverage the institutional function of the asynchronous trial pattern,on the one hand,it should be clear that the applicable group of the asynchronous trial pattern is the vulnerable natural person group and strengthen its awareness;on the other hand,it should limit the scope of cases applicable to the asynchronous trial pattern in terms of the amount of litigation object,and highlight the non universality of the asynchronous trial pattern to reduce the impact of the asynchronous trial pattern on the justice value of civil procedure.
作者 王立源 Wang Liyuan(School of Law,Central University of Finance and Economics,Beijing 100098,China)
出处 《网络安全与数据治理》 2023年第3期46-52,57,共8页 CYBER SECURITY AND DATA GOVERNANCE
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目(18ZDA142)。
关键词 异步审理 互联网法院 简易程序 接近正义 直接言词原则 asynchronous trial Internet courts summary procedures access to justice the Principle of Directness and Verbalism
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献145

共引文献620

同被引文献36

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部