摘要
关于无身份者是否可以成立身份犯共同正犯的问题,理论界与实务界均存在争议。探讨我国刑法理论中无身份者成立身份犯共同正犯之前提要素,首先应明确我国是否属于区分制共犯体系,其次应探讨在理论上无身份者是否可以分担身份犯的实行行为。在区分制共犯体系下,应对我国《刑法》及司法解释中的“共犯”进行广义理解。当无身份者在身份犯的共同犯罪中分担部分实行行为并起到重要作用时,其具有与有身份者同等的正犯性与法益侵害性,可以认定无身份者成立身份犯的共同正犯。
There are disputes, theoretically and practically, on whether non-status criminal can be established as the joint principal offenders in the status crime. In order to discuss this possibility, there should be theoretical premise as follows. Firstly, we should clarify if China adopts the distinct system legislation mode. Secondly, we should discuss whether non-status criminal could carry out part of the perpetrating acts in the status crime. Under the condition of distinct system legislation in China, the “accomplice” in Criminal Law of PRC and judicial interpretations should be explained in a broad sense. Non-status criminal can be established as the joint principal offenders of status crime by carrying out some of the perpetrating acts together with the status criminal and playing an important role in the joint crime. At that time, non-status criminal possesses the same principal quality and legal interests with status criminal.
作者
徐岱
王沛然
XU Dai;WANG Pei-ran
出处
《吉林大学社会科学学报》
北大核心
2023年第2期51-64,235,共15页
Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition
基金
吉林大学廉政智库创新团队建设项目(2017LZZKY009)。
关键词
区分制
无身份者
身份犯
共同正犯
distinct system legislation
non-status criminal
status crime
joint principal offender
