摘要
本文通过分析“通权论”与“国家有机体论”“海权论”“陆权论”和“边缘地带论”等传统地缘政治理论的内涵以及作用方式的异同,认为传统地缘政治理论中的霸权和强权主义思想与当今时代发展存在相悖之处,进而分析这些理论中“通”的成分及其作用,并对“通权论”的内涵及作用方式等进行详细的阐述,提出“通权论”是对传统地缘政治理论的传承与拓展的结论。最后,针对世界各国如何发展“通权”提出了相应建议。
By analyzing the similarities and differences of the traditional geopolitical theories, such as "common power theory", "state organism theory", "sea power theory", "land power theory", and "marginal zone theory", This paper holds that the hegemony and power doctrine in traditional geopolitical theories are contrary to the development of the present era, and then analyze the role of the "communicative" component in these theories, and elaborate on the concept and connotation of the "common power theory", and then explain "General power theory" is the inheritance and extension of traditional geopolitical theories. Finally, it puts forward suggestions on how to develop "communication strength" in various countries in the world.
出处
《理论界》
2023年第1期1-7,共7页
Theory Horizon
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“东亚历史海域研究”(18ZDA207)
辽宁省“兴辽英才计划”哲学社会科学领军人才项目“北极问题研究”(XLYC2004008)
国家社科基金后期资助项目“通实力”研究(19FZZB013)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
通权论
国家有机体论
海权论
陆权论
边缘地带论
general power theory
state organism theory
sea power theory
land power theory
marginal zone theory
