摘要
跨境数据取证的有效开展以国家享有合法的刑事管辖权为前提。鉴于现阶段中美两国在国际地位、技术水平以及制度构建理念上的区别,具体立法规定与实践操作中有所不同。中国在网络空间主权论、数据有限流动理论等理念的支撑下,属地原则仍是跨境数据单边取证制度的刑事管辖基础。而美国以网络无主权论、数据自由流动论作为制度基础,变通属人管辖以充分利用数据强国的地位,增强刑事取证管辖权。比较中美两国确定跨境数据单边取证刑事管辖的相异因素,建议我国进一步加强国家间合作,适度调整刑事管辖权,提升计算机技术,丰富刑事单边取证行为反制措施。
Cross-border data forensics must be based on the premise that the country enjoys legal criminal jurisdiction. In view of the differences between China and the United States in international status, technical level and institutional construction concepts at this stage, there are many differences in the specific legislation and actual operation of cross-border data forensics between the two countries. Supported by the theories of cyberspace sovereignty and limited data flow, China’s territorial principle is the criminal jurisdiction basis of the cross-border data unilateral forensics system. The United States, on the basis of the theory of network sovereignty and the theory of free flow of data, has adapted personal jurisdiction to take full advantage of the status of data power and strengthen the jurisdiction of criminal forensics. The paper compares the different factors of the criminal jurisdiction of unilateral forensics of cross-border data between China and the United States, and suggests that China further strengthen cooperation between countries, appropriately adjust criminal jurisdiction, improve computer technology, and enrich the counter-measures of criminal unilateral forensics.
作者
陈梦鸽
邵凯
Chen Mengge;Shao Kai(People's Public Security University of China,Beijing 100038,China;Fei County Public Security Bureau,Feixian 273499,China)
出处
《湖北警官学院学报》
2023年第1期83-91,共9页
Journal of Hubei University of Police
关键词
跨国犯罪
跨境数据
单边取证
刑事管辖
国家主权
数据流动
Transnational Crime
Cross-border Data
Unilateral Evidence Collection
Criminal Jurisdiction
National Sovereignty
Data Flow
