摘要
利用文献计量与内容分析方法,分析二十年(2001—2020年)来中外主要期刊中发表的关于档案利用研究的论文,说明中外档案利用研究热点的共性和差异。通过研究发现,中文期刊文献的关键词专指度更高、专业性更强,外文期刊文献的关键词范围更广泛,并不仅限于档案利用的研究领域,文献的内容更综合。因而,中外学者的有关研究,有基本共性,但差异性似乎更大。
This article uses bibliometrics and content analysis methods to analyze core journals at home and abroad in the past two decades(2001-2020). The paper on archives utilization research published in China explains the commonalities and differences in archive utilization research hotspots between Chinese and foreign academic communities. Through the research, it is found that the term in Chinese journals is more specific and professional,while the keywords of foreign language in journal documents are more extensive, and they are not limited to the research field of archive utilization, and the content of the documents is more comprehensive. Therefore, there are basic commonalities in the relevant researches on archival utilization between Chinese and foreign scholars, but the differences seem to be greater.
作者
李硕
傅荣校
Li Shuo;Fu Rongxiao
出处
《档案管理》
北大核心
2023年第1期30-34,共5页
Archives Management
基金
国家社科基金重点项目“基于全样本的国家档案馆公共服务能力评估体系研究”(18ATQ009)研究成果之一。
关键词
档案利用
比较研究
研究偏好
文献计量法
Archival utilization
Comparative research
Preference research
Bibliometric
