摘要
试点制是支撑中国取得瞩目成就的重要治理机制,试点单位选择是一个亟待关注的学术研究问题。本文从发挥试点方法的基本功能着眼,聚焦讨论试点单位的选择及其“科学性”原则,尝试补充现有研究视角的缺失。文章提出,“科学”选择试点单位应遵循三条基本原则:服从决策意志、具有充分代表性、总体规模较为经济。基于此,文章以住建部公布的三批智慧城市试点单位为对象,使用2014-2016年《中国城市统计年鉴》数据,综合运用量化分析方法进行评估。研究发现,智慧城市试点单位具有充分代表性,但是并未严格服从关于建设“门槛”的决策意志且总体规模不经济,整体而言,选择是部分“科学”的。将试点单位选择纳入试点研究的范畴,可以有效提升以试点制解释中国发展之理论的说服力,其“科学性”原则对于在实践中完善试点制治理机制亦具有借鉴意义。
Repeated failure of policy experimentation in recent years has sparked heated discussion in society.Existing research on these failures mostly focuses on the implementation process rather than the selection of pilot areas.Trying to explore a new perspective for the research on such questions,this paper examines the scientificity in selection of pilot areas.Based on data from Urban Statistical Yearbook of China(2014-2016)and taking 289 prefecture-level cities as samples,the empirical study examines three aspects—the satisfaction of policy requirement,the representativeness,and the scale economy—in the selection of three groups of subjects in the Smart City Experimentation conducted by the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development(MoHURD).The result indicates that the selection of pilot areas fails to follow a scientific strategy and results in functional failures.This is probably caused by the fact that local governments pursue qualification from the bottom up,while the central ministries and commissions compete to issue approval from the top.
作者
张权
谢荻帆
ZHANG Quan;XIE Difan
出处
《中共中央党校（国家行政学院）学报》
北大核心
2023年第1期85-95,共11页
Journal of The Party School of The Central Committee of The C.P.C（Chinese Academy of Governance）
基金
国家社科基金重大研究专项项目“新形势下化解群体性事件的新机制新手段研究”(18VFH019)
北京大学人文社科人才启动项目“互联网与国家治理研究”。
关键词
试点制
试点单位选择
“科学性”
智慧城市
Policy Experimentation
Selection of Pilot Areas
Scientificity
Smart City
