摘要
刑法规范是经验事实的集合体,规范与事实无法截然分离。目前依据规范功能和内容性质的区分方法,无法明确给予司法裁判者刑事违法性的实质判断标准,这导致中立性客观事实和一般违法性价值事实,被直接作为司法裁判的依据性事实,规范内部混杂的形式主义刑法观由此产生。刑法规范本质上是一种事实规范体系,“事实”来源于理论总结和立法进程中的事实趋势,而事实对象包含客观事实、价值事实、依据事实三类层级要素。刑法事实规范层级区分方法的类型化运用需要分步骤进行:在客观事实规范层级,区分中立性与否定性规范的出入罪;在价值事实规范层级,明确刑事违法性和一般违法性的衔接事实;在依据事实规范层级,塑造刑事违法性事实判断的独立方法。
The norms of criminal law are the collection of empirical facts, which cannot be completely separated from facts. At present, according to the differentiation method of normative function and content nature,it is impossible to clearly accord the judicial personnel the substantive judgment standard of criminal illegality.It leads neutral objective facts and general illegal value facts to be directly taken as the basis facts of judicial adjudication, which results in the formalistic criminal law view of intermingled norms. The criminal law norms are essentially a system of fact norms. “Facts” come from theoretical summary and fact trend in the process of legislation. The object of facts includes three levels of elements: objective facts, value facts, and basis facts. The application in different types of hierarchical differentiation method of fact norms in the criminal law is generally a step-by-step approach: at the level of objective fact norms, we should distinguish between neutral and negative norms;at the level of value fact norms, it is clear that criminal illegality and general illegality are connected;at the level of basis fact norms, we should create the independent method of judging the facts of criminal illegality.
出处
《社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第12期175-187,共13页
Journal of Social Sciences
基金
司法部法治建设与法学理论研究科研项目“数据犯罪治理的‘民行刑’衔接路径研究”(项目编号:21SFB3009)
四川省犯罪防控研究中心项目“法秩序统一视阈下数据犯罪治理研究”(项目编号:FZFKK22-10)的阶段性成果。
关键词
刑法规范
客观事实规范
价值事实规范
依据事实规范
层级区分
Criminal Law Norm
Objective Fact Norm
Value Fact Norm
Basis Fact Norm
Hierarchical Differentiation
