摘要
文章围绕如何确定商标侵权惩罚性赔偿的数额,以2014—2020年全国范围各级法院审理商标侵权惩罚性赔偿案件为样本,通过量化分析发现:惩罚性赔偿适用率极低但赔偿金额较高;以实际损失、侵权获利和许可使用费的倍数作为赔偿基数的计算方式适用率较低;法定赔偿事实上承担了惩罚性赔偿功能,其适用率较高但惩罚力度受到限制;侵权人主观过错、侵权次数和商标知名度对倍数的影响显著,且呈正相关。应增加法定赔偿作为赔偿基数的计算方式,明确主观过错等倍数考量因素的权重有助于惩罚性赔偿功能之实现。
In order to find out how to determine the amount of punitive damages for trademark infringement,we set up a sample of the punitive damages cases of trademark infringement heard by courts at all levels across the country be⁃tween 2014 and 2020.Empirical research shows that the using rate of the punitive damages is extremely low but the amount of damages are high;The proportion of calculation based on actual loss,infringing profit and times of license fee is very low;With quite high rate,statutory damages has the function of punitive damage but the punishment is lim⁃ited;The subjective fault of the infringer,the number of infringements and the popularity of the trademark have a sig⁃nificant and positive correlation on the times of damages.To address these problems,the paper suggest that the statu⁃tory damages can be used as the base for punitive damages,and the role of considerations should be more specific.
作者
徐洁
马强
Xu Jie;Ma Qiang(Civil and Commercial Law School,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出处
《科技与法律（中英文）》
CSSCI
2022年第6期1-10,共10页
Science Technology and Law（Chinese-English Version）
基金
2022年国家社科基金年度项目一般项目“非典型担保物权的法律构成与运用难题研究”(22BFX077)
重庆市教育委员会人文社会科学研究项目“生物安全损害赔偿制度规范构造研究”(21SKGH010)。
关键词
惩罚性赔偿
商标专用权
法定赔偿
赔偿倍数
赔偿基数
实证研究
量化分析
punitive damages
trademarks
statutory damages
the times of damages
the base of damages
empirical re⁃search
quantitative analysis
