摘要
经验法则作为案件事实认定的重要基础,有助于主体完成从已知证据或事实推导出最终待证事实。经验法则在刑事司法领域的适用具有正当性,蕴含在经验法则内部的盖然性部分免除了主体的说理负担。通过对283份一审刑事裁判文书的研究发现,经验法则在实务应用中存在概括性适用较多,规避说理倾向较为严重,适用模式缺乏回应性等问题。上述问题与我国传统印证模式的证据审查惯性、案件考核机制及经验法则的盖然性隐忧密切相关。基于此,可以通过统一经验法则判定标准、明确经验法则的适用内涵、协调印证证明模式、形成双向互补等方式予以纠偏。
The rule of thumb, as an essential basis for determining the facts of a case, helps the subject to deduce the ultimate facts to be proved from known evidence or facts. The application of the rule of thumb in the field of criminal justice is justified by the fact that the categorical part embedded in the rule of thumb relieves the subject from the burden of reasoning. A study of 283 first instance criminal adjudication documents shows that the rule of thumb has a more serious tendency to avoid reasoning in practice and the application pattern lacks responsiveness. These issues are closely related to China’s traditional model of evidence review, case assessment mechanisms and covert concerns about the rule of thumb.Based on this, the rule of thumb can be modified by unifying the criteria for determining the rule of thumb, clarifying the connotations of its application, harmonizing the modes of proof, and forming two-way complementary approaches.
作者
汪洋
WANG Yang(Criminal Justice College,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201620,China)
出处
《山西青年职业学院学报》
2022年第3期72-77,82,共7页
Journal of Shanxi Youth Vocational College
关键词
经验法则
印证模式
适用模式
自由心证
rule of thumb
mode of confirmation
adaptation pattern
free evaluation of evidence through inner conviction
