期刊文献+

miR-216a、p63联合NPS评分对微创食管癌切除术后患者预后的评估价值 被引量:3

Prognostic value of miR-216a,p63 combined with NPS score in patients after minimally invasive esophagectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨微小核糖核酸-216a(miR-216a)、p63联合那不勒斯预后评分(NPS)对微创食管癌切除术后患者预后的评估价值。方法回顾性选取2020年1月至2022年1月在中国人民解放军南部战区总医院治疗的食管癌患者109例,均给予微创食管癌切除术。截止随访结束时间2022年5月,发生复发转移患者19例,未复发转移患者90例。分析miR-216a相对表达量、p63阳性表达量与患者临床病理的关系,同时分析术后复发转移和未复发转移患者临床资料差异。多因素分析影响预后的因素,并分析miR-216a、p63联合NPS在预测患者预后方面的价值。结果肿瘤大小<5 cm、临床分期Ⅲ期、低分化患者miR-216a相对表达量为(1.31±0.18)、(1.30±0.20)、(1.27±0.14),p63阳性表达率为62.50%、64.00%、65.96%,明显高于肿瘤大小≥5 cm、临床分期Ⅰ+Ⅱ期、中高分化患者,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。复发转移患者肿瘤大小≥5 cm、临床分期Ⅲ期、低分化占比及miR-216a相对表达量、p63阳性表达率、NPS评分≥3分比率分别为68.42%、73.68%、78.95%、(1.33±0.22)、73.68%和57.89%,明显高于未复发转移患者,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示:临床分期、分化程度、miR-216a相对表达、p63表达和NPS评分是患者复发转移的影响因素(P<0.05),预测发生复发转移的ROC曲线下面积为0.830,敏感度和特异度分别为83.00%和73.00%。结论miR-216a、p63表达与食管癌患者肿瘤大小、临床分期、分化程度及复发转移存在相关性,miR-216a、p63联合NPS在预测患者预后方面有一定应用价值。 Objective To investigate the prognostic value of microRNA-216a(miR-216a),p63 combined with Naples prognostic score(NPS)in patients after minimally invasive resection of esophageal cancer.Methods A total of 109 patients with esophageal cancer treated in PLA Southern Theater General Hospital from January 2020 to January 2022 were given minimally invasive esophagectomy.As of the end of follow-up in May 2022,19 patients had recurrence and metastasis,and 90 patients had no recurrence and metastasis.The relationship between the relative expression of miR-216a,the positive expression of p63 and the clinicopathology of patients was analyzed,and the difference of clinical data between patients with recurrent metastasis and patients without recurrent metastasis was analyzed.The prognostic factors were analyzed by multivariate regression,and the value of miR-216a,p63 combined with NPS in predicting the prognosis of patients was analyzed.Results The relative expression levels of miR-216a in patients with tumor size<5 cm,clinical stageⅢ,and poorly differentiated patients were(1.31±0.18),(1.30±0.20),(1.27±0.14),and the positive expression rates of p63 were 65.96%,62.50%,64.00%,which were significantly higher than those of patients with tumor size≥5 cm,clinical stageⅠ+Ⅱ,moderately and well-differentiated,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).The proportion of tumor size≥5 cm,clinical stageⅢ,poorly differentiated proportion,relative expression of miR-216a,p63 positive expression rate,and NPS score≥3 points in patients with recurrence and metastasis were 68.42%,73.68%,78.95%,(1.33±0.22),73.68%and 57.89%,which were significantly higher than those without recurrence and metastasis,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Logistic regression analysis showed that clinical stage,degree of differentiation,relative expression of miR-216a,p63 expression and NPS score were the influencing factors of recurrence and metastasis(P<0.05),the area under the ROC curve for predicting recurrence and
作者 廖明 徐恩五 何哲 LIAO Ming;XU En-wu;HE Zhe(Department of Thoracic Surgery,PLA Southern Theater General Hospital,Guangzhou Guangdong 510010,China)
出处 《临床和实验医学杂志》 2022年第22期2411-2415,共5页 Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
基金 广东省自然科学基金项目(编号:2019A1515011298)。
关键词 微小核糖核酸-216a P63 那不勒斯预后评分 微创食管癌切除术 预后 MicroRNA-216a p63 Naples prognostic score Minimally invasive resection of esophageal cancer Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献59

  • 1Yuwei Zhang.Epidemiology of esophageal cancer[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2013,19(34):5598-5606. 被引量:80
  • 2Kondrup J,Rasmussen HH,Hamberg O,et al.Nutritional Risk Screening(NRS 2002):a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials.Clin Nutr,2003,22(3):321-336. 被引量:1
  • 3Stratton RJ,King CL,Stroud MA,et al.'Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool'predicts mortality and length of hospital stay in acutely ill elderly.Br J Nutr,2006,95(2):325-330. 被引量:1
  • 4Stratton RJ,Hackston A,Longmore D,et al.Malnutrition in hospital outpatients and inpatients:prevalence concurrent validity and ease of use of the‘malnutrition universal screening tool'(‘MUST')for adults.Br J Nutr,2004,92(5):799-808. 被引量:1
  • 5Sungurtekin H,Sungurtekin U,Balci C,et al.The influence of nutritional status on complications after major intra abdominal surgery.J Am Coll Nutr,2004,23(3):227-232. 被引量:1
  • 6Haldun G,Eren E,Recep A,et al.Evaluation of nutritional risk on admission to the general surgery department.Bratisl Lek Listy,2008,109(2):57-60. 被引量:1
  • 7Ozkalkanli MY,Ozkalkanli DT,Katircioglu K,et al.Comparison of tools for nutrition assessment and screening for predicting the development of complications in orthopedic surgery.Nutr Clin Pract,2009,24(2):274-280. 被引量:1
  • 8Sorensen J,Kondrup J,Prokopowicz J,et al.EuroOOPS:an international,multicentre study to implement nutritional risk screening and evaluate clinical outcome.Clin Nutr,2008,27(3):340-349. 被引量:1
  • 9Pereira Borges N,D'Alegria Silva B,Cohen C,et al.Comparison of the nutritional diagnosis.obtained through different methods and indicators,in patients with cancer.Nutr Hosp,2009,24(1):51-55. 被引量:1
  • 10非手术治疗食管癌的临床分期标准(草案)[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2010(3):179-180. 被引量:257

共引文献73

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部