期刊文献+

重大突发公共卫生事件中的公共信息发布:核心要素、演化路径及关键问题 被引量:1

Research on public information promulgation for major public health emergencies:Core elements,evolutionary path and critical issues
原文传递
导出
摘要 公共信息发布是重大突发公共卫生事件风险沟通的核心组成部分,是保障社会秩序的重要手段。通过系统梳理重大突发公共卫生事件国内外公共信息发布领域的研究成果,总结了重大突发公共卫生事件中公共信息发布科学设计的核心要素、事件发展多阶段演化路径。通过分析指出目前该研究领域的关键问题:在重大突发公共卫生事件的公共信息发布研究中,应重视新媒体环境下公共信息发布与舆情演化的平衡问题、公共信息发布的规范问题。 Public information promulgation is the core component of risk communication in major public health emergencies and plays an important role in ensuring social order.From the perspective of the information dissemination process in major public health emergencies.and combined with the information needs of the public at different stages of the development of major public health emergencies.this research aims at formulating norms for information promulgation for major public health emergencies in China.Taking the public information promulgation as a foothold.the core elements and evolution path of public information communication in major public health emergencies are explored.There are three core elements of public information promulgation:certainty of instruction public information,moderation of explanatory public information and acceptance of credibility public information.Based on public opinion of incubation period,acute period and remission period of major public health emergencies,public information promulgation should focus on characteristics of the period.In addition,the balance.heterogeneous and standard of the public information promulgation of major public health emergencies as critical issues are revealed.The findings of the present research would be helpful in gaining the scientific methods of the public information promulgation for decision makers,so as to provide important expansion and a useful supplement for the research of emergency risk communication in China.It is hoped that this research will help promote the further improvement of the emergency management system of major public health emergencies in China,and provide a theoretical basis and methodological basis for effectively improving the efficacy of public information promulgation for Chinese emergency governance of major public health emergencies.
作者 郑昱 ZHENG Yu(School of Journalism and Communication,Sun Yat-Sen University,Guangzhou 510006,China)
出处 《科技导报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第22期88-96,共9页 Science & Technology Review
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(72074236)。
关键词 重大突发公共卫生事件 应急风险沟通 信息发布 major public health emergency emergency risk communication information promulgation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献19

  • 1刘玉新,张建卫,金盛华.社会支持与人格对大学生压力的影响[J].心理学报,2005,37(1):92-99. 被引量:77
  • 2Covello V T. Risk perception,risk communication, and EMF exposure: tools and techniques for communicating risk information. In: Matthes R, Bernhardt J H, Repacholi M H, eds. Risk perception, risk communication, and its application to EMF exposure: Proceedings of the World Health Organization, ICNRP International Conference, 1998,Vienna: International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection,1998: 179~214. 被引量:1
  • 3Covello V T. Best practices in public health risk and crisis communication.Journal of Health Communication,2003,8(4) :5~8 被引量:1
  • 4Gariffin R J, Dunwoody S, Zabala F.Public reliance on risk communication channels in the wake of a cryptosporidium outbreak. Risk Analysis, 1998, 18(4) :367~375 被引量:1
  • 5Johnson B B. Exploring dimensionality in the origins of hazard-related trust.Journal of Risk Research, 1999,2 (4) :325 ~354 被引量:1
  • 6Covello V T,Peters R G,Wojtecki J G,etc. Risk communication, the west nile virus epidemic, and bioterrorism: responding to the communication challenges posed by the intentional or unintentional release of a pathogen in an urban setting. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2001,78 (2): 382~391 被引量:1
  • 7Cohen S, Wills T A. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin. 1985,98(2): 310~357 被引量:1
  • 8Paul D B,Thomas W B. Social support,group consensus and stressor-strain relationships: social context matters.Journal of Organizational Behavior,2001,22 (4) :425~430 被引量:1
  • 9Kahneman D, Tversky A. Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 17~43 被引量:1
  • 10Slovic P. Perception of Risk. Risk Analysis, 1987, 236 (17): 280-285 被引量:1

共引文献247

同被引文献45

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部