摘要
由于《民法典》第九百九十七条关于人格权禁令的规定过于原则,导致目前实践中大多数法院参照人身安全保护令程序审查人格权禁令申请,如此操作不仅在程序合法性方面存疑,而且有可能引起程序适用的混乱。鉴于人格权禁令既不同于行为保全,也有别于人格权诉讼,与人身安全保护令之间属于一般与特殊的关系,故不能盲目照搬已有程序规则。又因人格权禁令兼具诉讼与非讼程序属性,因此在程序设计时,应当交错运用诉讼与非讼程序法理,对从禁令申请到禁令审查,再到救济方式以及禁令执行等各个环节予以缜密考量。
As the provisions of Article 997 of the Civil Code on the injunction of personality rights are too general,most courts in practice are currently examining applications for injunction of personality rights by referring to the personal safety protective order procedure,which is not only questionable in terms of procedural legality,but may also cause confusion in the application of the procedure.In view of the fact that personality rights injunction is different from both the act preservation and personality rights litigation,and has the general and special relationship with personal safety protective order,so it is not possible to blindly copy the existing procedural rules.In addition,as the personality rights injunction has both litigation and non-litigation procedural attributes,the procedural design should intertwine litigation and non-litigation procedural jurisprudence and give careful consideration to all aspects,including the application,review,remedies and enforcement of the injunction.
作者
谢绍静
陶相辉
Xie Shaojing;Tao Xianghui(School of Law,China Jiliang University,Hangzhou,Zhejiang 310018)
出处
《河南财经政法大学学报》
CSSCI
2022年第6期132-143,共12页
Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
基金
2018年浙江省高校重大人文社科攻关计划项目“指导性案例制度研究”(项目编号:2018QN046)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
人格权禁令
人身安全保护令
行为保全
人格权诉讼
injunction of personality rights
personal safety protection order
behavior preservation
personality rights litigation
