摘要
BACKGROUND Prostate artery embolization(PAE)is a promising minimally invasive therapy that improves lower urinary tract symptoms(LUTS)related to benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).Transurethral resection of the prostate(TURP)is the gold standard therapy for LUTS/BPH.AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PAE vs TURP on LUTS related to BPH.METHODS A literature review was performed to identify all published articles on PAE vs TURP for LUTS/BPH.Sources included PubMed,Embase,Cochrane library databases,and Chinese databases before June 2022.A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted.Outcome measurements were combined by calculating the mean difference with a 95%confidence interval.Statistical analysis was carried out using Review Manager 5.3.RESULTS Eleven studies involving 1070 participants were included.Compared with the TURP group,the PAE group had a similar effect on the International Index of Erectile Function(IPSS)score,Peak urinary flow rate(Qmax),postvoid residual volume(PVR),Prostate volume(PV),prostatic specific antigen(PSA),The International Index of Erectile Function short form(IIEF-5)scores,and erectile dysfunction during 24 mo follow-up.Lower quality of life(QoL)score,lower rate of retrograde ejaculation and shorter hospital stay in the PAE group.There was no participant death in either group.A higher proportion of haematuria,urinary incontinence and urinary stricture was identified in the TURP group.CONCLUSION PAE may be an appropriate option for elderly patients,patients who are not candidates for surgery,and patients who do not want to risk the potential adverse effects of TURP.Studies with large cases and long follow-up time are needed to validate results.
