摘要
研究岩性差异对溶蚀速率的影响有助于提高溶蚀试片法估算岩溶碳汇强度的精确度。本文以贵州省普定县为研究区,将埋放地的主要基岩类型(石灰岩与白云岩)制成标准尺寸的试片,并将其埋设于不同土地利用类型和土壤深度下,经过4个水文年的监测后将估算的结果与前人在同一区域使用标准溶蚀试片的研究结果进行对比分析,结果表明:(1)在相同气候和土壤环境条件下,岩性对溶蚀试片的溶蚀速率有显著影响,且溶蚀速率与岩石中CaO含量呈正相关关系,与MgO含量呈负相关关系;(2)石灰岩与白云岩试片溶蚀速率的差异程度受土地利用及埋放深度的调控,整体上石灰岩溶蚀速率比白云岩溶蚀速率大14%;(3)不同岩性试片估算的岩溶碳汇强度相差较大,标准溶蚀试片估算的结果比埋放地基岩试片估算的结果高。故使用溶蚀试片法估算区域岩溶碳通量时应考虑埋放地基岩的岩性,或者对基于标准溶蚀试片的估算结果进行校正,才能准确反映区域尺度真实的岩溶碳通量大小。
Under the control of subtropical humid monsoon climate,karstification is very strong in the karst area of southern China.At the same time,a lot of researches indicate that the carbon sink formed by karstification in southern China may be an important part of the global missing carbon sink.At present,there are many research methods to estimate the intensity of karst carbon sink.The carbonate rock tablet test is one of the main traditional research methods to estimate the karst carbon flux.The main principle of this method is based on the chemical reaction of water CO_(2)-carbonate rock.The specific operation is to bury the carbonate rock test piece with the same size under the soil,then take them out and weigh them after a certain time,use the dissolution amount of rock tablets to calculate the dissolution rate and karst carbon flux in study area.Finally,the regional karst carbon sink can be estimated according to"point by area".In the study of estimating karst carbon sink in China,previous scientists used pure limestone from Rongxian formation of Devonian System in Guilin.However,the geological background of different regions is quite different,and the composition and structure of bedrock are different,so that the estimation results of standard carbonate rock tablets(pure limestone)may be also different from the actual dissolution amount of local bedrock tablets,resulting in great uncertainty in the estimation of karst carbon sink in the region.Based on this,in this study,we chose Puding county,Guizhou Province as the study area.The main bedrock types(limestone and dolomite)of this place are made into standard size rock tablets,and buried them in the typical land use types(secondary forest,shrub,grassland,dry land and paddy field)in the study area.After monitoring for four hydrological years,the dissolution rate and karst carbon flux were calculated,then compared them with the previous research results using the standard carbonate rock tablet(pure limestone)in the same study area,and the following results are obt
作者
张小琴
罗维均
王彦伟
蔡先立
吕伊娜
王世杰
ZHANG Xiaoqin;LUO Weijun;WANG Yanwei;CAI Xianli;LYU Yina;WANG Shijie(State Key Laboratory ofEnvironmental Geochemistry^Institute of Geochemistry,CAS,Guiyangt Guizhou 550081,China;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China;Puding Karst Ecosystem Observation and Research Station,CAS,Puding,Guizhou 562100,China;Rural Revitalization Research Center of Guizhou Universities,Anshun,Guizhou 561000,China)
出处
《中国岩溶》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2022年第3期477-487,共11页
Carsologica Sinica
基金
中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(B类)(XDB400202001)
国家自然科学基金项目(41673121)
贵州省高层次创新型人才培养计划“十”层次人才项目(黔科合平台人才[2016]5648)
贵州省省级科技计划项目支助(黔科合基础-ZK[2022]-564)。
关键词
白云岩
石灰岩
岩溶试片法
溶蚀速率
岩溶碳通量
dolomite
limestone
carbonate rock tablet test
dissolution rate
karst carbon flux
