摘要
共同富裕既是社会主义的本质要求,也符合中国特色社会主义制度的现实要求。稳步推进共同富裕需要科学的经济理论指导。本文通过比较新古典经济学、后凯恩斯主义经济学和马克思主义政治经济学三种经济学理论蕴含的共同富裕实现路径,发现新古典经济增长理论几乎没有为探讨共同富裕留下空间,而后凯恩斯主义经济学的新卡莱茨基模型虽然为探讨收入分配和经济增长之间的关系提供了一些洞见,但其操作方案在本质上是分配视角的共同富裕实现路径,偏离了马克思强调的“生产视角”的优先性原则。以“劳动纪律-总需求”模型为代表的马克思主义经济增长模型,综合了马克思的劳动过程理论和凯恩斯的有效需求理论,是真正回归马克思的生产视角的理论模型,能够为中国特色社会主义共同富裕道路提供理论指导。
Common prosperity is both the essential requirement of socialism and the realistic requirement of the socialist system with Chinese characteristics. The steady promotion of common prosperity undoubtedly requires the guidance of scientific economic theories. By comparing the paths to the realization of common prosperity in three economic theories: Neoclassical economics, Post-Keynesian economics and Marxist political economy, this paper finds that neoclassical growth theory leaves little room for exploring common prosperity, and that although the Neo-Kaleckian growth model of Post-Keynesian economics provides insight for exploring the relationship between income distribution and economic growth, the realization path of common prosperity provided by it in essence is common prosperity from the perspective of distribution, which deviates from the perspective of production emphasized by Marx. The Marxist growth model represented by the labor discipline-aggregate demand model, which integrates Marx’s theory of the labor process and Keynes’ theory of effective demand, is a theoretical model that truly backs to Marx’s production perspective. We argue this model could provide a theoretical basis for China to explore how to achieve common prosperity in a wage-led development path.
作者
高岭
唐昱茵
胡天禛
邵岩
Gao Ling;Tang Yuyin;Hu Tianzhen;Shao Yan(School of Economics,Xiamen University;School of Economics,Fudan University;School of Public Administration,Zhejiang University;School of Economics,Renmin University of China)
出处
《经济评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第5期3-17,共15页
Economic Review
基金
教育部人文社会科学基金青年项目“马克思主义政治经济学视角的国家理论演进及其当代意义研究”(项目编号:21YJC790033)
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金“政治经济学视角下国有企业生产组织创新与共同富裕实现路径研究”(项目编号:20720221030)的阶段性成果。
