期刊文献+

MRI多模态分级影像报告对前列腺外周带癌的诊断价值 被引量:1

The Diagnostic Value of Multimodal MRI Grading Imaging Report for Peripheral Prostate Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探析对前列腺外周带癌患者应用MRI多模态分级影像检测报告的临床诊断效果。方法选取2018年5月至2019年10月本院前列腺疾病患者86例,均经病理检查证实,分析MRI多模态分级影像对前列腺外周带癌诊断准确率,比较阳性组与阴性组MRI分级诊断评分,并利用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析MRI分级诊断评分对前列腺外周带癌诊断效能。结果多模态MRI分级对前列腺外周带癌诊断敏感度90.63%(29/32),特异度88.89%(48/54),准确率89.53%(77/86),阳性预测值82.86%(29/35),阴性预测值94.12%(48/51),Kappa值0.78;阳性组MRI分级诊断评分显著高于阴性组(P<0.05);多模态MRI分级诊断曲线下面积(AUC)0.902,MRI评分临界值为4分,对前列腺外周带癌诊断敏感度91.6%,特异度80.8%。结论MRI多模态分级影像可为前列腺外周带癌的诊断提供重要资料,其诊断与病理结果具有高度一致性,诊断效能高,具有重要应用价值。 Objective To explore the clinical diagnostic effect of MRI multimodal grading imaging detection report in patients with peripheral prostate cancer.Methods A total of 86 patients with prostate disease in our hospital from May 2018 to October 2019 were selected,all of which were confirmed by pathological examination.The diagnostic accuracy of MRI multimodal grading images for peripheral prostate cancer was analyzed,and the MRI grading of the positive group and the negative group was compared.Diagnostic score,and the receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was used to analyze the diagnostic performance of MRI grading diagnostic score for peripheral prostate cancer.Results The sensitivity of multimodal MRI grading for the diagnosis of peripheral prostate cancer was 90.63%(29/32),the specificity was 88.89%(48/54),the accuracy was 89.53%(77/86),and the positive predictive value was 82.86%(29/35),the negative predictive value was 94.12%(48/51),and the Kappa value was 0.78;the MRI grading diagnostic score in the positive group was significantly higher than that in the negative group(P<0.05);the area under the multimodal MRI grading diagnostic curve(AUC)was 0.902,The critical value of MRI score was 4 points,with a sensitivity of 91.6%and a specificity of 80.8%for the diagnosis of peripheral prostate cancer.Conclusion MRI multimodal grading images can provide important information for the diagnosis of peripheral prostate cancer,and its diagnosis and pathological results are highly consistent,with high diagnostic efficiency and important application value.
作者 盛伟华 黄松 冯军屏 李雨庚 黄辉 宋黎涛 SHENG Wei-hua;HUANG Song;FENG Jun-ping;LI Yu-geng;HUANG Hui;SONG Li-tao(Department of Radiology,Seventh People's Hospital of Shanghai University of TCM,Shanghai 200137,China)
出处 《中国CT和MRI杂志》 2022年第10期109-111,共3页 Chinese Journal of CT and MRI
关键词 多模态磁共振成像 分级 前列腺外周带癌 诊断效能 Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Grading Peripheral Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献62

  • 1Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CACancer J Clin, 2015, 65(1) : 5-29. 被引量:1
  • 2Delongchamps NB, Rouanne M, Flam T, et al. Multiparametricmagnetic resonance imaging for the detection and localization ofprostate cancer: Combination of T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging. BJU Int, 2011,107(9):1411-1418. 被引量:1
  • 3Vilanova JC, Barcelo-Vidal C, Comet J, et al. Usefulness of pre-biopsy multifunctional and morphologic MRI combined with free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio in the detection of prostatecancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2011,196(6) : W715-W722. 被引量:1
  • 4Tamada T, Sone T,Higashi H, et al. Prostate cancer detectionin patients with total serum prostate-specific antigen levels of 4-10ng/mL: Diagnostic efficacy of diffusion-weighted imaging, dy-namic contrast-enhanced MRI, and T2-weighted imaging. AJRAm J Roentgenol, 2011,197(3) : 664-670. 被引量:1
  • 5Hoeks CM, Barentsz JO, Hambrock.T,et al. Prostate cancer:Multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and stag-ing. Radiology, 2011,261(1):46-66. 被引量:1
  • 6Dickinson L, Ahmed HU, Allen C, et al. Scoring systems usedfor the interpretation and reporting of multiparametric MRI forprostate cancer detection, localization, and characterization:Could standardization lead to improved utilization of imaging with-in the diagnostic pathway? J Magn Reson Imaging, 2013, 37(1)48-58. 被引量:1
  • 7Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, et al. PI-RADS ProstateImaging-Reporting and Data System: 2015,Version 2. Eur Urol,2016,69(1):16-40. 被引量:1
  • 8Bomers JG, Barentsz JO. Standardization of multiparametricprostate MR imaging using PI-RADS. Biomed Res Int, 2014,2014:431680. 被引量:1
  • 9Franiel T, Ludemann L, Rudolph B, et al. Evaluation of normalprostate tissue, chronic prostatitis, and prostate cancer by quan-titative perfusion analysis using a dynamic contrast-enhanced in-version-prepared dual-contrast gradient echo sequence. InvestigRadiol, 2008,43(7):481-487. 被引量:1
  • 10Baur AD, Maxeiner A, Franiel T,et al. Evaluation of the pros-tate imaging reporting and data system for the detection of pros-tate cancer by the results of targeted biopsy of the prostate. In-vest Radiol, 2014,49(6) :411-420. 被引量:1

共引文献164

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部