期刊文献+

中学化学教学中的科学思维与逻辑辨析 被引量:8

Discussion on the Scientific Thinking and Logical Discrimination in Middle School Chemistry Teaching
原文传递
导出
摘要 化学是一门具有创造性的基础科学,是环境、生命、医药、材料等科学的基础,在思维逻辑上彰显和蕴含了丰富的科学思维方法。系统总结化学科学思维方法,可以有效破解中学化学学习中的“繁,难,乱”。在多年的教学实践中,提出了化学科学多向思维方法体系,强调多层次思维过程中对多因素的立体逻辑思维辨析。重点介绍了与中学化学教学相关的零阶、初阶、中阶和高阶逻辑思维辨析的内涵,期望化学教学中重视化学思维逻辑过程,实现化学教与学在思维模式上的深层次发展与提升。 Chemistry is a creative fundamental science, which is the basis of environment, life, medicine, materials and other sciences. It shows and contains novel scientific thinking methods in thinking logic. Systematically summarizing the thinking methods of chemical science can effectively solve the “complexity, difficulty and chaos” in middle school chemistry learning. In many years of teaching practice, we have put forward the multi-directional thinking method system of chemical science, focusing on the three-dimensional logical thinking discrimination of multi factors in the process of multi-level thinking. This paper focuses on the connotation of the discrimination of zero order, primary order, medium order and high-order logical thinking related to middle school chemistry teaching, and expects to emphasize the logical process of chemical thinking in chemistry teaching to realize the deep development and improvement of chemical teaching and learning in thinking mode.
作者 邢国文 孙根班 李会峰 那娜 XING Guo-Wen;SUN Gen-Ban;LI Hui-Feng;NA Na(College of Chemistry,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
出处 《化学教育(中英文)》 CAS 北大核心 2022年第16期44-48,共5页 Chinese Journal of Chemical Education
关键词 化学科学思维 逻辑辨析 化学教学 多因素 chemical thinking logical discrimination chemical teaching multi factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献32

  • 1范骁骏.论思维方式[J].哲学研究,1991(5):50-58. 被引量:6
  • 2徐土根,顾一新,陈钧.化学教学中学生科学思维方法的培养[J].中学化学教学参考,2001(11):14-15. 被引量:1
  • 3彭堃墀.非经典光场及其在量子信息中的应用[J].山西大学学报(自然科学版),2007,30(2):173-180. 被引量:5
  • 4George,K. D. A comparison of the critical-thinking abili- ties of science and non-science majors. Science and Edu- cation, 1967,51 ( 1 ), 11-18. 被引量:1
  • 5Novak, J. D. An approach to the interpretation and measurement of problem solving ability. Science and Ed- ucation, 1961,45 (2) : 122-131. 被引量:1
  • 6Stuessy, C, L. Path analysis: A model for the develop- ment of scientific reasoning abilities in adolescents. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1989,26 (1): 41-53. 被引量:1
  • 7Stieff, M. Improving representational competence using molecular simulations embedded in inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2011,48 (10) : 1137-1158. 被引量:1
  • 8Pine,J. , Aschbacher, P. ,Roth, E. ,Jones,M. , et al. Fifth graders' science inquiry abilities: A comparative study of students in hands-on and textbook curricula. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2006,43 (5) : 467-484. 被引量:1
  • 9Kuhn, D. Teaching and learning science as argument. Science and Education, 2010,94 (5) : 810-824. 被引量:1
  • 10Teichman, L. The ability of science students to make conclusions. Science and Education, 1944, 28 (5): 268- 279. 被引量:1

共引文献209

同被引文献64

引证文献8

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部