期刊文献+

大数据时代思想政治理论课教学技术理性的反思与超越 被引量:4

Reflection and Transcendence of Technical Rationality of Ideological and Political Theory Teaching in the Era of Big Data
下载PDF
导出
摘要 大数据时代基于认识论思维的思想政治理论课教学产生了技术理性的倾向,这在具体的教学活动中表现为教学内容的知识化、教育对象的抽象化、教学方法的技术化和考核方式的量化。教学中的技术理性以认识客观世界的思维方式来把握人的精神世界,抽象预设了人的精神活动领域的恒定规律,从而将思想政治理论课这一对话性和理解性的价值观教育活动简化为价值信息的传输和接受活动。超越思想政治理论课教学中的技术理性要求从教学认识论走向教学诠释学,即通过关系性思维、主体性思维、开放性思维以及社会历史性思维更新思想政治理论课的教学理念与教学方式。 The teaching of ideological and political theory courses based on epistemological thinking in the era of big data has produced the tendency of technical rationality, which is manifested in the specific teaching activities as highlighting knowledge of teaching content, the abstraction of education objects, emphasizing technology in teaching methods and the quantification of assessment methods. The technical rationality in teaching uses the thinking mode for understanding the objective world to grasp the spiritual world of human beings, and abstractly presupposes the constant law of the spiritual activities of human being, thereby simplifying the conversational and understanding value education activity of ideological and political theory class into the transmission and acceptance of value information. Transcending the technical rationality in the teaching of ideological and political theory courses requires that the teaching epistemology should be transformed into teaching hermeneutics. That is, the teaching ideas and teaching methods of ideological and political theory courses should be updated through relational thinking, subjective thinking, open thinking and social historical thinking.
作者 毕四通 金林南 Bi Sitong;Jin Linnan
出处 《江苏高教》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第8期120-124,共5页 Jiangsu Higher Education
关键词 思想政治理论课教学 技术理性 理解性教学 反思性实践家 ideological and political theory teaching technical rationality comprehension teaching reflective practitioner
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献29

  • 1肖瑛.“反身性”研究的若干问题辨析[J].国外社会科学,2005(2):10-17. 被引量:61
  • 2马克思恩格斯文集:第2卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009:593. 被引量:523
  • 3Schon, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner:How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books Inc. Publishers. 20. 被引量:1
  • 4Pearson, A. T. (1989). The Teacher: theory and Practice in Teacher Education. New York: Routledge. 27. 被引量:1
  • 5Labaree, D. F. (1992). Power, Knowledge, and the Rationalization of Teaching: A Genealogy of the Movement to Professionalize Teaching. Harvard EducationalReview. 62(2). 141. 被引量:1
  • 6Valli, L. (1997). Listening to Other Voice: A Description of Teacher Reflection in the United States.Peabody Journal of Education. 72(1). 67. 被引量:1
  • 7Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. Boston: D. C. Heath and Company. 9. 被引量:1
  • 8Schon, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner:How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books Inc. Publishers. 50. 被引量:1
  • 9Squires, G. (1999). Teaching as a Professional Discipline. London: FalmerPress. 10. 被引量:1
  • 10Urban, W. J. (1990). Historical Studies of Teacher Education. In: Houston, W. K., Haberman, M.& Sikula, J. (eds.). Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. New York: Macmillan. 63. 被引量:1

共引文献96

同被引文献36

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部