摘要
民法典和国家赔偿法均未对行民混合侵权的责任形态及救济途径作出规定。以规范主义的路径,从单一行政主体侵权的角度分析行政赔偿的性质,难以为实践提供帮助;而以功能主义的路径,站在混合侵权的视角,将混合侵权中的行政赔偿定性为“准民事责任”则更加合理。参照民法中多数人行为形态与责任形态的对应理论,可将行民混合侵权类型划分为共同的行民混合侵权、分别的行民混合侵权、竞合的行民混合侵权和构成“第三人侵权”的行民混合侵权,并分别对应连带责任、按份责任、不真正连带责任或补充责任以及补充补偿责任。由此,相关救济程序的设计应采取合并审理的模式,并在“双重救济制度”的基础上展开。
Neither the Civil Code nor the State Compensation Law provides for the liability form and relief approach of mixed tort.It is difficult to provide help for practice to analyze the nature of administrative compensation from the perspective of single administrative subject's tort from the path of paternalism.From the perspective of mixed torts,it is more reasonable to define the administrative compensation in mixed torts as"quasi-civil liability".With reference to the majority of people in the civil law behavior form and responsibility form the corresponding theory,line and mixed type of infringement can be divided into common infringement,the line of people respectively mix line people line people of mixed infringement and infringement,competition and cooperation constitute infringement of a third person"line people of mixed infringement,and corresponding joint and several liability,according to responsibility,not the real joint liability or supplement responsibility and compensation responsibility.Therefore,the design of relevant relief procedures should adopt the mode of combined trial and be carried out on the basis of"dual relief system".
出处
《江苏警官学院学报》
2022年第3期40-48,共9页
Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute
基金
2021年西南政法大学科研创新项目“第三人介入行政侵权的赔偿责任研究”(2021XZXS-342)。
关键词
行民混合侵权
国家赔偿
责任形态
行政附带民事诉讼
mixed infringement
state compensation
form of responsibility
administrative collateral civil action
