摘要
我国《公司法修订草案》呈现出向董事会中心主义转变的趋势,在明确勤勉义务内涵、加强董事权责的同时,应配套相应董事行为标准和免责出口,以实现权责平衡。为此,学界长期关注的美国法上的商业判断规则,可为董事的决策提供法律保护,以鼓励商业创新并构建商业问题司法审查的谦抑性。司法实践中,早有法院通过商业判断规则为董事决策提供保护。但由于缺乏明确的依据和指引,法院对该规则存在诸多适用问题,需要通过成文法规则予以导正。在此过程中,可考虑借鉴德国法将商业判断规则法典化的经验以解决我国司法适用中存在的勤勉义务虚置、大股东压制等问题,包括采取严格的勤勉义务过错标准和举证责任倒置等方式。
The current round of draft amendments to China’s company law shows a trend toward board-centeredness.While clarifying the connotation of the duty of diligence and strengthening directors’rights and responsibilities,corresponding standards of directors’conduct and exemptionclause should be matched to achieve a balance of rights and responsibilities.To this end,the business judgment rule in the U.S.law,which has long been concerned by the academic community,can provide legal protection for directors’decisions in order to encourage business innovation and construct the modesty of judicial review of business issues.In judicial practice,some Chinese courts have already provided protection for directors’decisions through the business judgment rule.However,due to the lack of clear basis and guidance,the courts have applied the business judgment rule with many misunderstandings,which shall be corrected by statutory rules.In this process,the codification of the business judgment rule in German law can be introduced to solve the problems of the marginalization of the duty of diligence and suppression of major shareholders in the judicial application in China,which includes strict fault standards for the duty of diligence and inversion of the burden of proof。
作者
杨大可
林指
Yang Dake;Lin Zhi(School of Law,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092)
出处
《河南财经政法大学学报》
CSSCI
2022年第4期76-89,共14页
Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
基金
2021年上海市社科规划年度课题一般项目“全面加强党的领导背景下国企内部监督机制重构研究”(项目编号:2021BFX013)的阶段性研究成果。
