摘要
《论住宅问题》一方面对蒲鲁东等人从经济现实向“永恒公平”的跳跃、法律所具有的经济社会规则改造能力的幻想进行批判;另一方面,也在批判的过程中对马克思恩格斯法律观作进一步的阐释。人们在一定社会生产力发展水平约束下自发形成的社会经济交往关系所“内含的规则”,作为法律的先在规则而存在,法律本质上是对这一规则的体现。这是与离开经济规则的法学空话完全不同的植根于经济规则的法学观点,是对马克思恩格斯关于法的认识的第二个层次的清晰表达,为全面、完整地把握马克思恩格斯的历史唯物主义法律观提供了重要依据。
On the one hand,it criticizes prouton’s leap from economic reality to eternal fairness and the fantasy of law’s ability to transform economic and social rules.On the other hand,Marx and En⁃gels’legal view is further explained in the process of criticism.The“inherent rules”of social and economic relations,formed spontaneously under the constraint of a certain level of social productive forces,exist as the prior rules of law,and law is in essence the embodiment of these rules.This is a legal viewpoint rooted in economic rules,which is completely different from the empty words of law without economic rules.It is a clear expression of the second level of Marx and Engels’understand⁃ing of law,and provides an important basis for comprehensively and completely grasping Marx and En⁃gels’legal view of historical materialism.
作者
谢婵婷
Xie Chanting(Teaching and Research Department of Politics and Law,Party School of the Central Committee of CPC/National Academy of Governance,Beijing,100089)
出处
《宁夏党校学报》
2022年第3期66-70,共5页
Journal of the Party School of the CPC Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region Committee
