摘要
本研究以积极心理为视角编制可应用于绝大部分职业群体的职工心理健康量表,并检验其信效度。抽取全国各地各行业、各岗位职工1881人施测,通过项目分析和探索性因素分析形成正式量表。再次向全国1907名职工进行正式施测,对回收数据进行验证性因素分析和信效度检验。职工心理健康量表共包含五个维度,分别是职业感知、职业效能、情绪稳定、同事关系、家庭和谐,总计36道题。总量表的内部一致性系数为0.93,各维度的内部一致性系数在0.76~0.93之间,总量表重测信度为0.82。模型拟合度较高。职工心理健康量表具备较好的信效度,符合测量学标准,可作为测量我国职工心理健康状况的有效工具。
To develop a mental health scale suitable for Chinese employees and test its reliability and validity,after sorting out and analyzing existing mental health measurement tools at home and abroad,this research constructed the theoretical dimensions of our country’s employee mental health measurement tools and compiled a preliminary measurement table of employee mental health.A sample of 1881 employees from various industries and positions in all parts of China was tested,and a formal scale was finally formed through project analysis and exploratory factor analysis of recovered data.Another formal test was conducted on 1,907 employees nationwide to conduct confirmatory factor analysis and reliability and validity test on the recovered data.The mental health scale of employees consisted of five dimensions,namely,occupational perception,occupational efficacy,emotional stability,colleague relationship and family relationship.There are 36 questions in total.The scale had good reliability and validity.The Cronbachαcoefficient of the scale was 0.93,and the internal consistency coefficients of each dimension were between 0.76-0.93.The test-retest reliability of the total scale was 0.82.The model had a high fitting degree(χ^(2)/df=3.75,RMSEA=0.04,GFI=0.94,NFI=0.91,RFI=0.91,IFI=0.94,TLI=0.93,CFI=0.94,AGFI=0.93).The employee mental health scale can be used as an effective tool to measure the mental health status of employees in China.
作者
王昕悦
姜媛
贾浩哲
方平
WANG Xinyue;JIANG Yuan;JIA Haozhe;FANG Ping(Department of Psychology,Capital Normal University,Beijing 100037;Department of Psychology,Beijing Sport University,Beijing 100084)
出处
《心理研究》
CSSCI
2022年第3期246-252,共7页
Psychological Research
基金
北京市社会科学基金项目(17JYB009)。
关键词
职工
心理健康
量表编制
信度效度
employee
mental health
scale development
reliability and validity
