摘要
目的:修订女性主义认同发展量表(feminist identity development scale,FIDS),检验其在中国女性大学生群体中的信度和效度。方法:对1657名女性大学生施测中文版FIDS、自尊量表(the self-esteem scale,SES)和矛盾性别偏见量表(ambivalent sexism inventory,ASI)中的敌意性别偏见分量表,随后进行项目分析、信度分析、探索性因子分析、验证性因子分析和效标效度的检验。结果:修订后的中文版FIDS共有27个条目,保留了5个分量表,分别是被动接受、醒悟、融合发展、整合和积极投入,累积方差贡献率为56.18%;五因子模型拟合较好(χ^(2)/df=2.99,IFI=0.92,CFI=0.92,GFI=0.92,TLI=0.91,RMSEA=0.05);中文版FIDS的内部一致性系数(Cronbach’sα)在0.71~0.89之间,分半信度在0.75~0.90之间。结论:修订后的中文版FIDS在中国女性大学生群体中具有较好的信效度,是测量女性主义认同发展水平的有效工具。
Objective:To revise the Feminist Identity Development Scale(FIDS)and examine the reliability and validity in Chinese female college students.Method:Take the Chinese version of FIDS,the Self-Esteem Scale and the hostile sexism subscale of Ambivalent Sexism Inventory to make a survey among 1657 female college students,and then item analysis,reliability analysis,exploratory factor analysis,confirmatory factor analysis and criteria validity test were completed.Results:The revised Chinese version of FIDS had a total of 27 items,which retained five subscales(Passive Acceptance,Revelation,Embeddedness-Emanation,Synthesis and Active Commitment),and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 56.18%;The five-factor model fitted well(χ^(2)/df=2.99,IFI=0.92,CFI=0.92,GFI=0.92,TLI=0.91,RMSEA=0.05);The Cronbach’sαof the Chinese version of FIDS ranged from 0.71 to 0.89,and the split-half reliability ranged from 0.75 to 0.90.Conclusion:The revised Chinese version of FIDS has good reliability and validity among Chinese female college students,which is an effective tool for measuring the level of feminist identity development.
作者
毛静
贡喆
王鑫瑶
Mao Jing;Gong Zhe;Wang Xinyao(School of Psychology,Sichuan Normal University,Chengdu 610048)
出处
《心理学探新》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第6期563-569,共7页
Psychological Exploration
基金
四川省应用心理学研究中面上项目(CSXL-212A08)
四川省大学生创新训练项目(S202010636087)。
关键词
女性主义认同发展
女性主义认同
信度
效度
feminist identity development
feminist identity
reliability
validity