摘要
“可比性”作为当前我国“一带一路”法治化体系建构中的基础性理论问题,并未受到法学界的应有关注。对社科法学知识传统中“可比性”概念的历史主义辨析,可发现它与“可移植性”“相似性”存在着紧密的意义关联。“可比性”的实质在于,“比较”的展开围绕的是何种学科属性与学科视角、“比较”要达致何种价值、意义与目的。藉由英国法人类学家格拉克曼所记录的部落社会典型个案的实证分析,可完整揭示传统法学有关“可比性”标准的缺陷。基于“一带一路”法治理论与实践的发展需要,“历史—类型”分析框架的创设,不仅可以克服传统“可比性”标准的内在局限,还可为“可比性”问题的深入研究提供系统性学理支撑。
As a basic theoretical issue in the construction of the legal system of the Belt and Road Initiative in China,“comparability”has not been widely accepted in the legal circle.Through the historical analysis of the concept of“comparability”in the tradition of social sciences of law,we find its close relationship with“transplantability”and“similarity”.The essence of“comparability”is connected with which disciplinary attributes and perspectives it is involved and what value,significance and purpose it is achieved.According to the empirical analysis of typical cases of tribal society that recorded by the British legal anthropologist,Max Gluckman,we can completely reveal the defects of the standards of“comparability”in traditional jurisprudence.On account of the development needs of the theory and practice of the Belt and Road,the establishment of“historytype”analysis framework which can not only overcome the inherent defects of the traditional standards of“comparability”,but also provide systematic theoretical support for the further study of jurisprudence of“comparability”.
出处
《中国政法大学学报》
CSSCI
2022年第2期65-76,共12页
Journal Of CUPL
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“中国共产党司法政策百年发展史研究”(项目批准号:21ZDA120)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词
可比性
法理
社科法学
法人类学
一带一路
comparability
jurisprudence
social sciences of law
legal anthropology
Belt and Road
