摘要
20世纪上半叶,法律概念与术语的本体论问题曾引发人类学界、法学界诸多学者的持续讨论。英国人类学家格拉克曼以社会人类学视角对传统的有关法律概念确定性的追求进行批判,创造性地提出了"模糊论"解释范式;以巴罗策部落社会为考察对象,借由一种"身份-头衔"的实践性分析进路,证实了部落社会法律概念与术语是真实存在的;与博安南就如何翻译部落社会法律概念与术语展开争论,论证了部落社会法律概念与术语具有可翻译性。格拉克曼的探究,意在揭示部落社会的法律文明与现代工业社会的法律文明之间不存在本质差异,为法律人类学知识传统的建构作出了重要贡献。
In the first half of the twentieth century,there had been a fierce debate between jurists and anthropologists on the ontology questions of legal concepts and terms.Max Gluckman,a British anthropologist,criticized the traditional quest on certainty of legal concepts from the perspective of social anthropology,and creatively advanced the interpretive paradigm of'ambiguity.'Taking the Barotse tribal society as the analysis object,through the approach of practical analysis of'status-title',Max Gluckman testified the real existence of legal concepts and terms of tribal society.The controversies between Max Gluckman and Paul Bohannan,which mainly focused on how to translate the legal concepts and terms of tribal society,demonstrated that the legal concepts and terms of tribal society were translatable.Max Gluckman’s academic research on the ontology questions of legal concepts and terms,which aimed to prove that the legal civilization of tribal society did not differ from that of western society,had made a great contribution to the construction of knowledge tradition of legal anthropology.
出处
《民族研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期47-58,共12页
Ethno-National Studies
