期刊文献+

肩关节镜下缝线桥技术治疗巨大肩袖撕裂的前瞻性研究 被引量:6

Prospective Study of Arthroscopic Suture-Bridge Technique for Treating Giant Rotator Cuff Tears
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨肩关节镜下缝线桥技术治疗巨大肩袖损伤的临床效果。方法 选取我科2018年1月至2020年9月收治的肩袖巨大撕裂病人120例,随机纳入单排缝合组、双排缝合组和缝线桥组,每组40例。比较三组病人治疗前后肩关节疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分、肩关节Constant-Murley功能评分、加州大学洛杉矶分校(University of California at Los Angeles,UCLA)肩关节评分和美国肩肘外科协会(American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons,ASES)评分及术后并发症发生情况。结果三组病人术后3个月时VAS评分未见明显统计学差异,但是缝线桥组术后6个月及9个月时VAS评分较单排缝合及双排缝合组明显降低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后3、6、12、24个月,缝线桥组的Constant-Murley功能评分、UCLA评分和ASES评分均较单排缝合组及双排缝合组明显增高,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);缝线桥组病人再撕裂发生率较单排缝合组及双排缝合组明显降低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 肩关节镜下利用缝线桥技术修复巨大肩袖全层撕裂,能够取得良好的疗效,更有利于腱骨愈合,是一种合理有效的治疗手段。 Objective To explore the clinical effect of suture bridge technique after arthroscopic debridement in the treatment of giant rotator cuff injury.Methods A total of 120 patients with giant rotator cuff tears admitted to our department from January 2018 to September 2020 were selected.Patients were divided into single-row suture group,double-row suture group and suture bridge group randomly.The visual analogue scale (VAS),Constant Murley score,University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and their complications before and after treatment were compared.Results There was no significant difference in VAS score among the three groups at 3 months after operation,but the VAS score at 6 and 9 months after operation in the suture bridge group was significantly lower than that in the single row suture group and double row suture group (P<0.05).At 3,6,12 and 24 months after operation,the Constant Murley function score,UCLA score and ASES score in suture bridge group were significantly higher than those in single row suture group and double row suture group (P<0.05).The incidence of re-tears in suture bridge group was significantly lower than that in single row suture group and double row suture group (P<0.05).Conclusion Arthroscopic repair of giant full-thickness rotator cuff tears with suture bridge technology can achieve good curative effect and is more conducive to tendon bone healing.It is a reasonable and effective treatment.
作者 尚文强 刘晓旭 王琳 SHANG Wen-qiang;LIU Xiao-xu;WANG Lin(Department of Orthopaedics,Fengfeng General Hospital of North China Medical and Health Group,Handan 056200,China)
出处 《骨科》 CAS 2022年第2期140-145,共6页 ORTHOPAEDICS
基金 邯郸市科学技术研究与发展计划项目(19422083046ZC)。
关键词 巨大肩袖损伤 肩关节镜 单排缝合技术 双排缝合技术 缝线桥技术 Huge rotator cuff Shoulder arthroscopy Single-row suture anchor technique Double-row suture anchor technique Suture bridge suture anchor technique
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献43

  • 1潘海乐,张一翀,吕松岑,任聪,张翼飞,于洪波.使用单排缝合技术和缝线桥技术修补中度肩袖撕裂的结果比较[J].中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2014,2(2):85-90. 被引量:7
  • 2Denard PJ, Burkhart SS. The evolution of suture anchors inarthroscopic rotator cuff repair [ J ]. Arthroscopy, 2013,29(9):1589-1595. 被引量:1
  • 3Galatz LM, Ball CM, Teefey SA, et al. The outcome and repairintegrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massiverotator cuff tears[ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2004, 86-A ( 2 ):219-224. 被引量:1
  • 4Dines JS, Bedi A, Elattrache NS, et al. Single-row versus double-row rotator cuff repair: techniques and outcomes [ J]. J Am AcadOrthop Surg, 2010, 18(2) :83-93. 被引量:1
  • 5Mall NA, Lee AS, Chahal J, et al. Transosseous-equivalent rota-tor cuff repair: a systematic review on the biomechanical impor-tance of tying the medial row [ J ]. Arthroscopy,2013 , 29 ( 2 );377-386. 被引量:1
  • 6Park MC,Elattrache NS, Ahmad CS, et al. '* Transosseous-equivalentM rotator cuff repair technique [ J ]. Arthroscopy, 2006 ,22(12) :1360. el-e5. 被引量:1
  • 7DeOrio JK, Cofield RH. Results of a second attempt at surgicalrepair of a failed initial rotator-cuff repair [ J ]. J Bone Joint SurgAm,1984,66(4) :563-567. 被引量:1
  • 8Park MC, Tibone JE, ElAttrache NS, et al. Part II: biomechanicalassessment for a footprint-restoring transosseousequi valent rotator cuffrepair technique compared with a double-row repair technique [J]. JShoulder Elbow Surg, 2007, 16(4) :469-476. 被引量:1
  • 9Kim KC, Shin HD, Lee WY, et al. Repair integrity androw versus suture-bridge technique[ J] . Am J Sports Med, 2012,40(2) :294-299. 被引量:1
  • 10Carbonel I, Martinez AA, Calvo A, et al. Single-row versus doub-le-row arthroscopic repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: aprospective randomized clinical study [ J ]. Int Orthop, 2012, 36(9):1877-1883. 被引量:1

共引文献61

同被引文献60

引证文献6

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部