摘要
与其他经验研究一样,整体网研究关注的并非整体本身,实质是属性化、分裂的抽象研究。它预设了二分法,关注关系的形式,忽视了关系中的价值等内容;关注结构,无视个体能动性;关注普遍规律,忽视特殊个体;坚持还原论,忽视关系本身的涌现性。上述问题之所以存在,根源在于整体网(乃至一般社会科学)所坚守的同一律在生活世界中恰恰不成立,这意味着社会科学的基础不牢靠,根据律才最重要。对整体本身的探讨难在语言本身有局限,运用抽象概念,知性思维多意见,存在被忘再难现。在此复原之途中,应找回存在的意义,关心作为存在的关系,然而,因工具理性日益强盛,复原之途愈加艰难。
Like other empirical studies, whole network approachdoesn’t focus on the“subjects itself”, i.e.“whole-network itself”, it isfundamentally an abstract research which presuppose part-whole dichotomy.This dichotomy makes it focuses on the form of ties rather than itscontent;structure rather than agency;general laws rather than individualitself. Furthermore, it sticks to reductionism and neglects the emergenceof ties themselves that cannot be reduced to parts of them. The reason ofthese problems is that the“law of identity”behind whole network studydoesn’t work in life-world at all, which also means that the foundationsof social sciences are not solid, and law of ground is the most importantone. Due to language limitation, abstract concepts used, understandingthinking, and forgotten Being,“whole network itself”is difficult to study.The significance of ties as Being should be examined in the end. However,the more instrumental rationality developed, the harder Being be pursued.
出处
《社会研究方法评论》
2022年第1期8-36,共29页
Social Research Methods Review
基金
国家社会科学基金资助(18BSH009)。
关键词
规律
真理
同一律
根据律
二分法
还原论
整体网
Law
Truth
The law of identity
The law of Ground
Dichotomy
Reductionism
Whole network
