摘要
关系研究大致可以分成儒家社会理论的立场、社会学的立场和人类学的立场等。这些立场对于关系的研究虽各有自己的贡献,却也有各自的局限性。而当前兴起的社会资本概念则同关系研究之间最有可能出现出嫁接与融合。通过对以往关系分类及特点的讨论,可以发现,中国人的关系基础在逻辑上建立于持久而无选择性的交往之上,这点将引发关系的特征主要指向人际间的情理、义务、权力放大及计策运用等,并在持久性关系解体后构成一种趋向工具性的关系网络,这些同社会资本关注的问题有所区分。
Relation study falls into such standpoints as Confucian social theories, sociology and anthropology, which make respective contributions to relation study but also have their own limitations. The concept of social capital arising currently is the most likely to merge into relation study. Through previous discussion on categories and features of relation, it can be seen that Chinese relations are established logically on the basis of lasting but unselective associations, which results in relations are mainly characterized by interpersonal reasons, obligations, power amplification and tactics exertion. Moreover, relations constitute a kind of tool-oriented relation network after the disintegration of lasting relations. These somewhat differ from the issues that social capital focuses on.
出处
《江苏社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第3期118-130,共13页
Jiangsu Social Sciences
基金
国家教育部优秀人才支持计划项目资助
关键词
儒家社会理论
社会资本
关系分类
捆绑性纽带
义务界定
Confucian social theories
social capital
categories of relation
binding tie
the delimitation of obligations
