摘要
黄宗羲在其名著《明儒学案》中将泰州学派的学风概括为“非名教之所能羁络”的狂禅化和异端化。但是,《明儒学案·泰州学案》所收人物并非全部都能归入此类学风,甚至有些思想家是以反对狂禅学风著称的,方学渐即为其中典型。这种看似矛盾的思想史书写方式,其实蕴涵着黄宗羲深刻的哲学洞见。通过将方学渐心学置于中晚明阳明学核心问题中考察其思想定位、背景与困境,在揭示出《泰州学案》思想主旨及哲学洞见的同时,亦能厘清方学渐心学何以展现“朱王调和”形象的理论根源。这种双重视角研究,在推进学术界对于阳明后学复杂的理论形态及其思想史出路的认知方面具有独特优势。
Huang Zongxi summarized the style of Taizhou School as crazy Zen and heresy in his work Mingru Xue’an.However,not all characters collected in“Taizhou Xue’an”has the same style of study.Even some thinkers are famous for opposing crazy Zen,of whom Fang Xuejian is a typical example.This seemingly contradictory narration of intellectual history actually contains Huang Zongxi’s profound philosophical insight.By placing Fang’s philosophy of the mind in the central issue of Yangming School in the middle and late Ming Dynasty to examine its ideological positioning,background and dilemma,the central thought of“Taizhou Xue’an”and Huang’s philosophical insight will be revealed.Meanwhile,the theoretical root of how Fang’s philosophy of mind reflects the image of the harmony between Zhu Xi’s and Wang Yangming’s thoughts can also be clarified.
作者
陈畅
CHEN Chang(School of Humanities, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)
出处
《同济大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第1期90-98,共9页
Journal of Tongji University:Social Science Edition
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“中国经典诠释学基本文献整理与基本问题研究”(21&ZD055)。
关键词
黄宗羲
泰州学案
方学渐
思想史书写
Huang Zongxi
Taizhou Xue’an
Fang Xuejian
narration of intellectual history
