摘要
当代学术界在黄宗羲思想研究方面有"守旧"与"开新"之辨,由此导致黄宗羲犹如"一人分饰两角"般在中国思想史上出场。事实上,黄宗羲在中晚明心学内部获得思想创新的动力与资源,其思想代表着明清之际哲学转向的心学路径。而问题在于,人们对于这种转向较为陌生,这是近代以来黄宗羲思想研究中存在诸多割裂的根本原因。通过对比王阳明和黄宗羲对三代之治的不同构想,厘清黄宗羲针对晚明以来的形上学与政教困境提出的解决方案,是重新评估心学与明清之际思想转型之关系的一个重要切入点。
There are two contemporary views on the scholarship of Huang Zongxi: the first one can be called conservative and the other innovative,and Huang Zongxi’s appearance in the history of Chinese thought has been said to be like "one person playing two roles". In fact,Huang Zongxi’s thought marks a dramatic philosophical shift in the School of Mind promoted by the Neo-Confucians during the Ming and Qing Dynasties. The basic reason why contemporary scholars hold contradictory views on Huang Zongxi’s thought is because people are relatively unfamiliar with this shift. By comparing different views on the Ideal Governance in Three Generations,one held by Wang Yangming and the other by Huang Zongxi,this paper investigates Huang Zongxi’s solutions to the ideological dilemmas in the late Ming Dynasty,and it also attempts to explain the internal relationship between the School of Mind and the transformations in thought during the Ming and Qing Dynasties.
出处
《哲学动态》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第6期47-57,127,128,共13页
Philosophical Trends
基金
国家社会科学基金一般项目“东林学派与明清之际哲学转向研究”(20BZX064)的阶段性成果。
